Jump to content

Bfg

TSSC Member
  • Posts

    1,167
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    44

Everything posted by Bfg

  1. Tuesday my old college buddy, Chris, came up from Winchester to visit me for a couple of days. Of course he was late getting up here ..blaming heavy traffic around the M25 and up the A12 - which we all know is a preposterous excuse. Anyway we didn't do much, save going out for supper, to the Sorrel Horse, and then back home to watch Appoloosa ..along with enjoying a decent bottle of Cabernet Sauvignon. But he wasn't going to get away without doing some jobs, so on Wednesday morning, correct to forecast of rain all day, I enlisted his help with one of my old bikes, from the storage container so that I might ride it home. . . ^ let me introduce to you my dear old Sunbeam S8'Nudge ' (1953) and formerly my daily rider. But due to circumstances, she was last used at the beginning of December 2021. The tyres were mostly deflated, the petrol stale and the battery flat ..but after a few priming kicks she started for me. Chris, seen above, is a motorcyclist too - but without 'the knack', which comes with familiarity of the type, he struggled. I rode the bike back the five or so miles back home with Chris following up in my Chrysler. Man .. did I enjoy that ride ..despite the light drizzle, it was fun. The plan is to use her again as my 'daily ride' ..mostly for just popping out around town. Mature cheddar with onions and black pepper on wholegrain toast thereafter followed, and then off to the marina - because Chris likes to see what progress I have, or haven't made, in recommissioning the boat. ^ looking distinctly boat-project-neglected in the dull wet weather, Chris was kind enough to appreciate the fresh anti-fouling. On board we conversed over what I might best do with her dull teak bulkheads. He's suggesting a sheet covering of shower-thickness Formica as an easy-to-wipe-clean surface, but I suspect that would be whole lot of work (templating and careful cutting and then edge trimming) as well as expensive. So I'm still in favour of just slapping a coat of paint on them. We'll see.. I've next to prepare Barbara-B for a survey ..for sake of in-the-water insurance. But as I've made so many modifications to standard - I fear that may not be so easy, unless I can find an inspector with a sound understanding of engineering materials. Hey ho, I'm sure we'll muddle through. In the meantime . . . ^ I thought it prudent to totally remove the small solid-fuel (smokeless-coal) burner I'd designed and made ..simply to avoid a lengthy conversation about it &/or its installation's safety standards - which I've exceeded but are primarily for inland-waterway boats (as I cannot find any specific regulations regarding such a stove on a sailing catamaran). Another concern was the boat's old cooker, which doesn't have thermal couples to turn off the gas ..should the flame blow out. The cooker is perfectly serviceable, but donkey's years old, and after a visit for advice from Simon in Fox's Chandlery about retrofitting such gas-cut-offs, I suspect I'll have to bite the bullet and replace it. Moving on, to a coffee shop, and then home for a curry supper and film watching. The latter Chris chose was the classic Stanley Kubrick's - 2001 A Space Odyssey ..which in turn was followed by a late-night discussion over brandy, regarding whether Hal (the computer) was sentient or just else a programmed intelligence ?, what were its motives for murder ?, and whether the mistake was actually a mistake or deliberate ?, and the difference between instinctive nature and learned programming or sociology.? Why do we go there at that time of night ! ? Yesterday, on Thursday afternoon, after an English breakfast and Chris heading off, back down south, I took Katie out in the, again correctly forecast, fabulous mild and sunny weather. We again drove across to Framlingham castle, not least because they were open and had a coffee shop. Katie didn't mind about either, but I did ! ^ It was a good drive, and the first countryside outing in the car since fitting the new half shafts. After being diverted TomTom found us some nice little lanes to wind wade our way through ! ^ there's always a king's welcome at Framlingham ^ But there was a darned cool breeze up on those battlements. Still the view is nice. ^ And as always I came away cleverer than when I arrived. ^ One of the problems with castles is that their very high walls, without windows, make for very long shadows. This photo taken at 3:05 pm on a bright and sunny day, barely illustrates what it must have been like to live within those thick cold wall - through the winter months. ^ driving home before 5pm and it was really too dark for my camera to record much more than an abstract image. Thankfully Katie's indicator warning light is now behaving itself, and Katie 's H4 headlamps are good and bright, as indeed now are all the LED side lights and indicators. The last Thursday of each month is (one of) the TR Register's East Saxon's group meetings, which was usually held at The Alma, Copford, near Colchester, but last night we tried another nearby pub/restaurant - The Cricketers, Spring Lane, Fordham Heath, Colchester CO3 9TG. Although we had just three TR's ..all TR4/4A's including Katie - the turn out of members was a good number. Things are new and so perhaps many of us were guilty of not circulating as much as we might, I think we all had a pleasant evening. I treated myself to a spiral of Cumberland sausage on a bed of mash potato, with with I specifically ordered fried onion with the gravy.. and it was deliciously wholesome, and pretty good pub value at under £13. Rich C-R very kindly found and passed onto me from fellow club member Leda - a TR4/ 4A/5 boot luggage rack ..which I'd been wanting for Katie, specifically to stow my removable half-section of Surrey roof on. I designed and made it to fit inside the car, on the shelf behind the seats, or else within the boot - but as & when I go away for the weekend or longer - then I'll want those more convenient places for luggage. Aside from being the only Christmas present i got, it was by far the best ! A very BIG THANK YOU to Leda for that rack. It's just what I wanted. My next club meeting is with the TSSC Suffolk group, which meet on the first Tuesday of each month at the Sorrel horse, Barham, IP6 0PG, on the 3rd January. Hopefully we'll have nice weather for that too.. Be glad to see you there. Pete
  2. Hey Peter, I changed from using the column's left hand stalk for the lights, to having a dashboard mounted (TR4) three-position (off / side lights / main headlamp) light switch. With Katie being RH drive.. that light switch is fitted on the right of the steering column, next to the face vent. And so I now use the LH column switch for the overdrive ..handy being near the gear-change. What used to be the overdrive (two-position) switch on the RH side of the column, is now used for main and dip beam headlamps. That is conveniently just next to the TR4 dashboard light switch. In practice this switch layout is more intuitive for me, despite it being the other way around on my Chrysler Voyager. I've removed the foot operated main / dip beam switch, which in turn gives me a tad more toe space for my left foot, at rest. Pete
  3. Saturday Question for anybody ~ re. Electrical fault ? ~ indicator warning light continued to flash when the switch is off ..and the indicators themselves are off. I disconnected the feed (G/N) wire to the indicators (at the bullet connector from the switch) while I was playing around with the wiper motor, and now that I've reconnected it - the indicator warning light fault is no longer there. Can anybody suggest where the fault might have been ? Aside from the standard indicator wiring Katie is fitted with Bob's Hazard warning lights (..as illustrated below) and the lamps are each fitted with LED bulbs. The wiring under the dash is pretty secure, and presently the indicators and the hazard warning lights each work fine. Thanks in anticipation, Pete Reply from Rob H on the TR Forum " Well Pete, for the pilot to flash it obviously means the indicator relay was running. The only way it can do that is for there to be a current drain to earth on the L terminal. Usually it is the current drawn by the lamps that does this. If the indicator switch is off there should be no link to the lamps so there must have been something else taking current and the suspicion must lie with the wiring to the hazards switch. Perhaps there is a whisker of wire somewhere that was earthing out but has now been disturbed ? " Reply from Rob on the TR Forum " If you are using the LED compatible flasher unit from Classiccarleds, then it is quite normal to get 1 extra flash on the dash bulb after the indicators are off. " Me on Saturday at 4pm .. There's not a lot of wiring to go wrong under there. The bullet are all soldered and this connector is just a few inches from the relay (screwed onto the side of the TR4's face vent), and the wire from the indicator switch goes straight into that connector. The hazard switch is not much further away (it is fitted into the bracket which was originally used for bonnet release cable). With the engine running a faster than tickover, ie. full 12v power, the indicator warning light now does flash an extra one to one-and a half after the switch and indicators are off. I was just about to pull steering column indicator switch out and see if I can see a fault inside that, but the fault has gone away again even when the engine is rev'd. That's a nuisance.. as I now cannot hope to find it. Pete 4:45pm Faults back again, so now working by torchlight I pulled the indicator switch and played around twisting the connectors on it etc, to no avail. I'll take it as being normal then, as there are not 2-3 extra flashes. As before when the indicators or hazards are switched on - the warning light behaves correctly. Pulling the 'L' connnector off the flasher stops it and the indicators working. Just in case, I added an external earth wire to the relay's bracket, and it made no difference. The fault remains. Could it be a fault within the flasher unit that responds to engine vibration ? It's now 5-o'clock so I guess I'd better pack up for this evening. Starting the car every ten minutes won't earn me any neighbourly friends. I was very careful when I soldered the connections onto the tiny hazard warning switch, but I'll pull it out and see if I can find a fault in those connections. It'll be a job for tomorrow. Thanks Bob and Rob - I appreciate your thoughts. Happy Christmas Eve, Pete - - - Today . . . Yesterday I'd pulled out the steering column switches and decided the wires were all too tightly squeezing back into the aluminium shroud. The wires' insulation is hardened and in places cracked so after straightening out the suspected-to-be-the-guilty-party (.. the indicator wires into the back of the switch) and a good brushing clean with carb cleaner & wiping dry with clean tissue - I coated them in liquid electrical tape. ^ drying that insulating / plastic coating with the warmth of a candle on Christmas day. Regarding the too tight shroud (for the number and routing of wires)... Today I pulled the steering wheel and eased the steering column outer sleeve so that I could turn it for access to easing out the wire's through-routing. . . ^ When going through the wiring earlier in the year, I'd already eased a bit of the cowling away (first photo, red arrow) but I decided today that it was still far too tight, and unnecessarily so, as the switches are hidden under a plastic cowling anyway. 2nd photo shows how much further I've now taken it. This then gives ample room for the overdrive switch' wires (..which happens to be the switch I'm now using for the headlamps main / dip beam) as well as the wires for the indicators. I similarly opened up the orifice underneath this cowl where the wire come out of the cowl before heading under the dashboard. Pulling all the wires out was a faff.. but all-in-all I think useful - as I don't like vehicle wiring to be unnecessarily pinched together, especially through places where there's no room for anti-chafe grommets. Job done and all put together again, wires reconnected and checked to work correctly etc.. ^ Test drive on a pleasantly dry & mild Boxing Day afternoon suggests that the issue I had, with the indicator-warning-light continuing to flash when turned off - has, for the time being at least, gone away. The likely fault was as Rob suggested, was that the indicator relay was inadvertently being earthed ..other than when switched. And that would have been the wire from the relay to the switch - perhaps only-just (hence it's flickering) shorting out against the pressure die-cast switch body or perhaps even the aluminium steering column shroud. It certainly wasn't obvious to see but then possibly the electrical fault was via tracking across dirt particles.? Either way, it now works as it should (one flash extra after the indicator switch is turned off), as do the windscreen wipers, all the lights and horn, etc. Success. Bidding you a good evening and a pleasant holiday. Pete
  4. ^ Very Nice Jase, I do like the combination and the colours. Wiper motor reassembly ; Before I reassembled the wiper motor I thought to clean out the back corner of the bulkhead shelf, which is usually inaccessible because of the wiper motor being in the way. It all went well, but then I noted some bloom ..further forward, and so added a little paint over that to smooth things off again .. unfortunately (or whatever word you might imagine I exclaimed !) that last patch ended up looking like this . . . ^ Not much I could do about it in the cold and damp, so I've left it for another day. I want to flatten and redo the rest of these shelves anyway which show hand-painting brush marks. ^ moving onwards and, hopefully this time, forwards.. the component parts were cleaned and tarted up ready for reassembly.Thankfully there were no tell-tale smells of burning from either the field coil or the armature. The armature, worm drive end, was reassembled into the gearbox and the field-winding carefully positioned over the armature (sans brushes). The armature bearings were lighty coated with moly-lithum grease, and I smeared the tongs on the ends of the bush arms with Vaseline, as they are an electrical contact. The commutator end of the brushes were of course left dry. The brush arms were then reassembled, and the fibreboard fitted (behind the new red wire) which helps prevent the arms coming apart while the tensioning spring is fitted (blue arrow) ..or should that spring break at any time. It's fiddly holding the two insulation T-eyes in place and then hooking the spring into each hole, but it went easily enough thanks to a decent pair of needle nose pliers inherited from my father. Of course one needs to be careful that the spring goes right through each hole rather than just hooking on. ^ alternative views. The first hopefully clarifies my point about the fibreboard holding the end of the arms onto their contacts (which I'd smeared with Vaseline), and the second showing the brushes sitting against the now cleaner commutator. Note the red wire turns quite tightly to clear the end cap ..yet to be fitted but which projects further down than the terminal connectors. The wire's tail-end leads through a hole in the motor's other end, which is cast as part of the gearbox casing. Don't forget to refit the earth connector, which fits under one of the end cap's long screws (just seen in the piccies below) ^ the end of the drive-cable was refitted, under the crankshaft's little end pin. before the (now pretty) gearbox top cover could be refitted. The red wire was cut to length and its tail-end soldered to the (park mechanism's) connector on the cap. I'd powered up / checked the wiper motor operated and the gearbox functioned correctly before refitting it. Refitting the drive-cable back into its outer sleeve (undisturbed still on the car) was sticky-finger messy from the copious amounts of moly-lithium grease I wiped into the drive-cable's spiral winding. ^ all back together again. Shame about the paint on this bulkhead, but all in all it is looking prettier and now works. As I said above ; it seems slow when checked I'd reassembled it straight, but subsequent to a new connector and a new earth (at the switch) its now OK and seemingly good to go. Checking and re-lubricating the wiper motor was on my job list, so another item ticked off I bid you a warm and comfortable Christmas, Pete
  5. It is a common fault on these IRS chassis, but not so very serious - because a spring seat doesn't need to be absolutely accurate. After all it's a flexible spring that sits in a rubber vibration-isolating collar which loosely fits into that seat. Although possibly caused by a lack of bump stop at some time, I suspect it has cracked through repetitive fatigue over the years and the hardening or disintegration / failure of its rubber vibration collar. I might be misreading it, but your photo suggests the cracked flange has sprung outwards...And that the spring seat has not pushed upwards very much at all. I'd recommend you thoroughly clean into the corner and into the crack, then just pull the sprung metal back into line and weld it up within that inside corner ..but then reinforce the spring hanger with a triangular plate front and back so as to distribute the loads to further down the chassis' tower.. This < here > is my TR4A chassis, showing the reinforcement I suggest. Best regards, Pete
  6. After two weeks of my working on the boat and then another two weeks of freezing weather, over here in Suffolk we're back to sunshine and mild temperatures - so doors could be opened again, plants can go back out into the fresh air, and like so many households - in preparation for Christmas.. washing had to be done. It's too damp to finish my painting the anti-fouling under the boat's keels, so today I opted to work on Katie. My most recent trips out, first to Norwich and then to our local TSSC meeting highlighted two electrical faults which each need to be urgently addressed. One was that the indicator's tell-tale light sometimes continue to flash when the indicators are cancelled, and the other being the windscreen wipers only work a couple of swipes and then stop ..and despite fiddling with the switch will not resume. When I got in after the club meeting I tried again, but this time I manually helped the wiper arm to move. It then swept the windscreen. From having gone through the wiring connections, I know that both the indicator and the wiper switches are 'iffy. My good friend Rich has used spares which I had hoped to pick up from him at the last meeting ..but I didn't make it. In any case I'd not yet checked the wiper motor, nor lubricated the cable mechanism, so that's what I started on this afternoon. . . ^ Katie's wiper motor installation. I wanted to remove it completely so after recording the wiring connections ; I removed those, I undid the large nut which attaches the drive cable, removed the hex-head set-screw with its big washer, you can see, which attaches the motor's black mounting bracket to the bulked shelf, and two set-screws ..reached from inside the car (under the dashboard). Those three set-screws each have captive nuts, but on this car - the one on the bulkhead-shelf took a 10mm ring-spanner and the two inside - a 7/16" socket. With the wiper arm's lifted off, so their drive-spindles can freely rotate, the wiper motor with its spiral cable can be withdrawn, leaving the cable's outer sleeve conduit and the wiper's wheel boxes in place and undisturbed. ^ The wiper motor's gearbox top-cover has four set screws (1/4" AF socket) which when relieved give access to the worm-drive from the motor, and the crankshaft which operates to push and pull the drive cable to the wiper-arms. I was pleasantly surprised to see that it was not caked up inside, with 50-year-old grease, as has been every other classic car wiper motor I've pulled apart. The drive cable had a hard kink though, just where it went into the wiper motor, so I bent that straighter by hand. Then, very carefully, I prised the little-end pin of the crankshaft up and out of the cable's end. The greasy drive-cable was put to one side, but again I was happy to see the grease on it wasn't at all hard-caked. The (sorta of reddish) wire from the motor to the gearbox's top cap is for the wiper's parking. Its rubber insulation is cracked through in several places and so will be replaced. I cut the wire near the cap's connection - I'll un-solder it anon, but in the meantime it meant that the gearbox top-cover could likewise be set aside. ^ After some cleaning up, around the outside, to prevent grime from getting inside, I removed the motor's two end-cap hex-head (long) set-screws for access to the motor's brushes. I've seen very much filthier and the brushes are serviceable, but one electrical connector was rusty and the armature was not exactly shiny copper clean. ^ with the parking wire to the gearbox cover cut, the motor's field-winding can be withdrawn (with the wire) from the gearbox. The armature's worm-drive can then be pulled out / unwound from the crank-wheel. Beware the armature brushes, the two insulation T-eyes (orangy colour) and the tiny spring, which can drop out once the armature is removed. ^ Turning the armature in my fingers, I used a scouring pad (wrapped around the copper contact surface) to clean it up. ^ next up was to clean the crud out from inside the field winding, to visually check things were in good order, and again I used the scouring pad to clean the contact faces onto which the contact brush arms seat. All in all, a little fiddly and time consuming, and before you know it.. the daylight had gone. I thought better of faffing around like a blind mouse, so packed up and made myself a cuppa tea ..and washed my hands before emptying the washing machine. A bachelor's work never ends I hope to replace that wire, and finish this off tomorrow. Cheers, Pete
  7. hello.. Its too cold to do any epoxy or painting on the boat, and too cold for me to work on the car, or trailer, in the polytunnel. So this week I'm hibernating with a monstrous, authoritative but difficult to read, book on The English Castle 1066-1650 by John Goodall. Everyone to their own eh ! Unfortunately the old cottage I now rent (the downstairs of) is both cold and damp, with night storage heaters &/or mobile electric radiators. Even with just heating the one room I'm in, is I think going to cost a a king's ransom this winter ..and so I thought I'd share with y'all a purchase just made < here >. It's a desiccant dehumidifier, and not cheap but is pretty quiet and of relatively low power consumption. It was enthusiastically recommended to me, by my friend Steve, who lives on a sailing boat down in Fox's marina ..which is very much more damp and cold than here - he's just bought one and after just 90 minutes the humidity in his boat's cabin has dropped from 90% to 55% He tells me that his old dehumidifier wouldn't get it down that low even after 9 hours. Aside from the debilitating discomfort, humidity on the windows and walls, being unable to dry bedding and clothes (..and the salt and pepper grinders being too damp to work !) I relate being cold and damp with the arthritis my dear ol nan was crippled with. I don't want that. £175 is a lot of money, but if feeling dry saves on the power presently being consumed by the electric heaters, then it may pay for itself over the nest four months. This sort of unit is small enough to be portable to go from one room to another, to use in the boat and even to sit inside the Triumph, in the polytunnel under its car cover (with drain pipe led out). I'll let you know how I get on with it in a couple of day's time. Pete p.s. I ordered it with inclusive of 2-day delivery from the Marine superstore, which cost £5 more than Steve paid from Fox's chandlery (who are hoping for new stock next week)..
  8. ^ Thanks. I like to see a little of red, white and blue. I just hope this Jotun's anti-fouling works well. No sailing plans for next season, but for getting the boat in the water, and re-commissioned. Lots need to happen; systems, rudders, re-rigging, possibly new mast, and very probably new sails, as well as trying to get the outboard serviceable after 14 years of sitting there, so again possibly a new motor. All in all lots of time and money to be poured in. Having taken last Monday off I went back across town to the boat on Tuesday ..to move her blocks and paint those previously inaccessible patches underneath. The one side went well . . . ^ The huge wooden blocks that hold the boat off the ground and level are under Barbara-B's timber keels. After epoxy priming the accessible bits under the keel, I had moved the supporting blocks, on this side, from near the ends to nearer the middle so that I could then get underneath to also epoxy under those places. On Tuesday I wanted to move the blocks back again to also paint the barrier coat and anti-fouling. The 3-ton low-profile, high-lift trolley jack I bought last year to work on Katie, my Triumph TR, was well up to the job of lifting just one side of a 30ft / 3-ton catamaran up. However.. lifting her port side (left) hull didn't happen nearly as easily . . . Although I have a stack of tools and fastenings spare parts in the bilges of this hull, the weight would still have been well within the capabilities of this trolley jack. Not so.. it lifted it a bit and then failed. One of the two 'quick action' pistons refused to come back up again and then the jack wouldn't lift more than perhaps a ton. Fortunately I had my 20+year old cheapo 1-ton trolley jack in the back of the Chrysler, which managed to lift the hull just a little more, and then the new(ish) jack managed to get the last 1/4" I needed to move the supporting blocks along. Rather than being a one lift operation, it happened in something like six stages .. of lifting and moving one block at a time and then moving the jacks, but in the end it was successful. Naturally it was quite frustrating for what should have been a two minute job to take the best part of three quarters of an hour of scrabbling around on my knees, on stony ground. And of course disappointing that such a useful and supposedly professional tool should have failed to deliver after just 18 months of infrequent light use. Not trusting Chinese quality, I'd deliberately bought this one from CJ Auto's, who are well respected for their classic car lifts and body-shell rotisseries (rather than buying from an e-bay package trader), and yesterday phoned them to see what they might suggest. Having spoken to the nice lady who answered the phone I'm now waiting to hear from their manager. This is all I needed to get to, under the keel. to scrape the remains of the old (blue) anti-fouling off and to paint it. On this side all I could do was to clean it up and then leave it to dry out ..with a bubble-wrap open-bottomed skirt masking-taped above and around it to prevent rain water running down under. The weather here is forecast icy cold but reasonably low humidity, so hopefully it will dry out over the next couple of weeks. Under the starboard-side keel, because I'd already epoxy-primered it - it was dry, so I could get on and have now applied the barrier-coat paint. Job done, as far as I could. But while I had that paint out (which looks very much like Hammerite smooth) I wanted to try it on steel . . . This 2" square box section tube had been sitting out in the weather for a couple of years and so I wire brushed an area of the surface rust off one face before painting. I also painted a second uncleaned face ..just to see how well they each fair through the winter weather. A short day's efforts, so I stopped in the marina for a cup of coffee with my mate Steve before heading home via the grocery store and then Tool-Station. I wanted, and got, a 6" single-handed / quick-action g-clamp in the form of an Irwin Quick-grip for use when I fit the roof panel on Katie. This requires my squeezing it hard-sideways against its neoprene weather seal, as I put the rear fastening in, and the one-handed clamp makes it much easier. On Tuesday night was our local TSSC (Triumph club) meeting, so I pulled Katie out into the drizzly rain (no roof panel is needed in such light rain) and enjoyed an evening with friends. The drive home was dry and 'quite' cool. No-one else in the club came in their Triumph, let alone in an open-top car, on the December evening in the rain. They don't know how just 'sensible' that makes them all seem ! ..whereas I enjoyed using the car (she's much warmer than my motorcycle) in the fresh night air Pete
  9. Nothing from me for a week ! ..yep I haven't been out in Katie since the short test-drive subsequent to my replacing her half-shafts. The traffic around here, especially at the weekends and anywhere near shops seems to have quadrupled.. what a weird world we live in. That, and many of the historic sites I'm interested in visiting are closed ..from November onwards - I've instead had an eye on each day's weather forecast, for when I could get on with (outside) painting under the boat. In the meantime.., when the forecast expected wet, I got on with clearing out many years of stores from under the boat, a situation I made worse when forced to move home at short notice. . . ^ I'm not someone to throw something away until I know I won't need it - the space underneath the boat / between the hulls looked like this. ^ I finally got it down to an anchor, a barrel of wood, paint supplies and a tall work trestle. After, grit-blasting to remove the old and flaking anti-fouling (almost 4mm in places) I'd fitted a skirt around the boat - so that rain water would drip off that rather than run down and under the hull. The objective was to allow the hull's fibreglass to dry out properly, not least because she is a 50 year old boat and was last osmosis treated in 1995. After Katie was back on the road, I set to sanding the under-water hull and painting it with two coats of epoxy primer. I then filled any imperfections with epoxy filler and applied another two coats of epoxy primer, sanding down inbetween each. The white line beneath the blue strip was painted back in with two-pack gloss white paint., and then it was all left to cure for a while ..until last week. ^ Inbetween forecasted rain, and taking advantage of the still mild temperatures, I masked up the waterline and painted on two coats of interlayer / barrier / sealer ..a waterproof coating that is also a tie-coat for the anti-fouling paint going onto epoxy. That was Jotun's Vinyguard Silvergrey 88, and it went on very nicely indeed. Such a pleasure to work with - that I'll try it on steel to see if I can use it on the cars. Only the anti-fouling to go on now.. I'm using Jotun's SeaForce 30M which is a copper oxide based product generally for commercial use. To those who know boat maintenance, to apply anti-fouling at this time of year would seem pretty odd, but I've just been allocated a berth for next year in the marina (Fox's - Ipswich) and I can't afford to miss it. The wider beam of a catamaran (14ft in this case) doesn't fit well into most marinas - whose pontoons are economically spaced to take two mono-hulls, typically 10 to 12 ft beam maximum. So, run with the opportunities as they arise. . The met-office weather forecast for Ipswich, this coming week, is that the temperature will plummet - so I was getting desperate ..as to when I might get this painting done. If I miss this break in the weather then quite plausibly - it may not be until March or April before we get dry and mild weather together at the same time. Today.. job finished ..re-masking and one coat on yesterday, and a second layer of anti-fouling done today. The boat, Barbara-B (named after me mum) now has a beautiful red bottom again. . . ^ awkward, but very careful masking, just a mm or two above the grey tie-coat layers. ^ at last, peeling off the masking tape (as soon as the painting was done) and the waterline edge looks good. ^ Today's daylight was depressingly dull all day, so that even at its brightest I needed lights under the boat to see what I was doing. But, my mood this evening, having got that finished, is bright and shiny ..well I say finished..I still have to jack the boat up, move the supporting blocks and then paint under the keel in those four places. But compared to reaching up, or down under, to roll heavy and dull paint, for four hours solid each time - that's nothing. I think I'll take a day off tomorrow ! Pete
  10. ^^ this didn't happen because a friend who lives on his boat down at Fox's marina called up to go for lunch. At first I declined the invitation but then thought that he sounded as if he needed to have someone to talk to. We had a good roast-turkey lunch at the Swan, in Westerfield, and good conversation. 11 hours later and one too many coffees, it was late night and so no second half-shaft on Katie . Missed my local (East Saxons) TR group meeting in the evening, but that's just the way it goes sometimes. Friday, was cool but sunny here on the east coast, and natural light makes working on, and even under, the car much easier. . . ^ Fitting this was very much the same process as on the left side ; with wheel and brake drum off, old shaft removed, new half-shaft's hub removed, and the ferrous metal parts coated with clear lacquer, the spline and thread protected - it was ready to fit. The only difference to fitting the half-shaft into this side of this car was the exhaust pipe. . . ^ Fortunately Katie is fitted with a nice n' quiet exhaust system - a single pipe running back to the cross-box-silencer under the spare wheel well. But still, the hole to feed the half shaft through was not quite big enough. Happily with the silencer's RH exhaust clamp removed, and supporting strap released, I could prise the pipe down enough just enough to squeeze the half-shaft through. It did lightly scratch the shaft's new clear lacquer, across the black adapter piece - which is about 4mm larger in diameter than the flange, but thankfully the shaft went through without further dismantling of any other component. ^ the mating face of the brake's back-plate was a bit cruddy (..perhaps that reddish layer was hand painted red-oxide primer). I scraped that off so the hub's flange would mate onto a flat surface. Then it was just a matter of my wiping moly-lithium into the spline (carefully not onto the thread) and dropping the hub back onto the end of its shaft. As said before the six 5/16" UNF nylocs (1/2" AF socket) are tightened to just 16ft.lb. I didn't use Loctite on these threads, but I did on the diff flange nylocs. . . ^ with the exhaust clamp back in place and the exhaust shoved around to make sure it cannot reverberate against the chassis (particularly where it goes through the tunnel and I have additional T-shirt plates), and the job was almost done. Brake drum and wheel back on, and the car lowered to the ground, I tightened the outside hub nuts to 212 ft.lb. Inclusive of scrabbling around on the floor, stopping to take photos, removing the car off the four car-ramps, and putting the tools away - this side to took me about 2 hours to exchange. - - - Test drive - down the A14 wasn't at all comprehensive because of its traffic on a Friday afternoon, however from what I might ascertain . . . Town speed driving, getting to n' from the dual-carriageway through housing estate and a slow stretch of major trunk route, revealed the drive-train to be discernibly quieter and smoother than before, most notable through roundabouts and tighter turnings. On the dual-carriageway itself though - I'm just a little disappointed to report that Katie's resonant-type vibration persists between 60 and 70mph ..peaking around the mid 60's. At all speeds she's now smoother than I've yet known the car, but only below 60mph and at 70mph and above is she smooth. I still have a few more thing to do, not least to rebuild the front suspension, adjust the front's height, and to replace those wheel bearings. I noted today that the front-right wheel bearing is a little too loosely adjusted, and that in itself may contribute to some vibration. I also want to swap the old rear-brake-drums for the lighter-weight Alfin ones. So more tasks, and therefore more reports , yet to come ! - - - My primary concern, in spending the money on these shafts, was not one of vibration, but of a hub failure - after so many have been reported. Eradicating spline lock-up was a big bonus, and then smoothness is ..well a dollop of fresh cream on the top. In respect of the hubs, I'm pleased to say that I'm very-much-more confident (without the disconcerting clunks of the splines) to power-accelerate around roundabouts and tighter corners. Happily I'm getting close to being able to drive the car as she was designed to be used on the road. The half-shafts I've just taken off ? There's little or no discernible amount of play in those UJ's or splines, nor indeed in their wheel bearings. The UJ's are floppy though, and I suspect that with new UJ's and the splines freshly greased with moly-lithium - they would have been much smoother and quieter too. New hubs could have been bought separately. CV joints or UJ's .? By design, a pair of CV joints ought to offer smoother telescopic-articulation than a spline & UJ's ..of comparable quality. The CV joints used on these half-shafts are physically very small though, (by necessity ..to fit within the confines of a TR).. compared to the few front-wheel-drive ones I've had prior experience of. They are mass production items and I've put my money on trusting that they'll be fine for the power I might ever put through them, even when driven hard and with the car loaded. Although the original UJ half-shafts have already lasted a handful of decades of reliable use, I decided against buying a pair of uprated UJ half-shafts with coated spline. I guess I was enticed by the prospect of smoothness. You pay's your money . . . etc Pete
  11. I tend to use your second example, steadying the torch head. But I keep my fingers away from the end of the shroud. I don't wear gloves usually and that metal gets hot. Pete
  12. Yesteraday was the day I set to fitting the new CDD cv-jointed half-shafts, with new hubs. I'm sure anyone who buys a pair will take due note of the fitting instructions, as indeed I did ..once I'd figured out how to convert those into a format readable by my old (2003) version of Microsoft Word. < CDD's instructions may be found here > For those considering doing the task themselves, here's a quick pictorial review of my own experience. I trust Classic Driving Developments (CDD) won't mind me reproducing extracts of their written instructions here, to go along with my own photos . . . ^ I loosened the rear wheel's nuts (with the car on the ground) and then raised the whole car up onto four wheel ramps. I moved one of those ramps to support under the chassis (with timber blocks on the ramp to level the car), and used the trolley jack under the back end of the trailing arm - to raise it normal ride-height inclination. The second photo illustrates this, with the bottom of the trailing arm casting (for the damper link arm mounting) approximately level with the underside of the chassis rail. The wheel and the brake drum were then removed. " 2) Many of these cars have been repaired over the years, so check the shaft fit dimension; this is the distance from the face of the diff flange to the face of the trailing arm at normal ride height, 400 mm for TR. " ^ poking the tape measure through, above the chassis rail - to measure from the back face of the brake plate to the joint of the diff flange measured 403mm on both sides. I reckoned that was close enough as the instructions warn " When fitting these shafts and when fitted do not allow the max droop to exceed 440 mm measured from the centre of the hub / shaft to the return edge of the wheel arch. " Next up, is to remove the old half shaft. . . ^ I removed the four nyloc nuts (9/16" spanner) & their bolts (9/16" ring spanner), and rested the half-shaft on a block of timber on the chassis rail - supporting under the flange. This helps when the shaft is being withdrawn (through the trailing arm and brake's back-plate) as its diff end / that flange is already supported to the right height. ^ The hub nuts are undone (1/2" socket) and the old half-shaft complete with hub is withdrawn. Note ; the brake is not disturbed. It just rests on the trailing arm studs. I'd bought the cv-jointed half shafts complete with new hubs. The nut on the hub end is loose as the inner (diff end) cv-joint adapter does not fit through the trailing arm. "The driveshaft goes into the hub from the diff side and is then move back to engage the diff flange bolts / studs " . . . " On receiving your drive shafts remove the outer nut and washer and while holding the alloy hub and the drive flange together pull it off the CV joint spline. Place on a clean surface, flange uppermost. The driveshaft is provided assembled and all joints preloaded with grease, so no need to dismantle." ^ Undo the nut and pull the hub off the spline (thumb pressure on the end of the thread gets it moving). I suspect their comment "flange uppermost" is to keep dust out of of the hub. My work space may only be a poly-tunnel but it's not grimy ! ^ aside from the hub, the shiny bits of metal a ferrous. Having seen a relatively new one with surface rust starting to appear, I opted to give mine (the shiny bits not the rubber) a coat of clear lacquer. Radiator aided timely drying of said (smelly) paint. No paint on the spline nor on the diff-mating flange face. ^ I substituted their " Wire brush & clean the inside of the trailing arm so no dirt will fall onto the spline / hub assembly." with ; double wrap with bubble-wrap the splines to keep them clean and damaged-free during fitting. Next up ; " Various exhaust systems and dampers may have been fitted over the life of your car; so there may be slightly different procedures necessary. The lever arm damper on the near side will have to be detached from its’ chassis mounting (does depend on fuel pipe positions). Telescopic dampers also may have to be disconnected from the trailing arm. Stag / Innsbruck have telescopic which can remain in place. " . . . ^ on this side at least, I was very fortunate in not needing to dismantle, move, or even loosen any other component. The gap through which the splined end of the shaft must go, is a tight squeeze inbetween the lever-arm, the chassis rail, and the diff's flange - but with protecting sheet over the chassis rail, and articulating the joints, and thumbing the rubber gaiter upwards - it fitted. I haven't done the right-hand-side yet, so I can't say if that shaft will also go over Katie's single exhaust pipe. Tomorrow will tell ! ^ Cv-joint adapter (the black bit) has studs rather than through bolts. New nylocs were supplied. These were duly engaged with the diff's flange and a nut loosely screwed on while i checked the other end. Protection over the threaded end and the shaft's spline worked well. ^ despite the instructions (.. yes really ! ) - I wiped moly-Lithium grease around the spine, and the red grease (already in the hub) around the seal. The hub refits onto the half-shaft's spline and engages with the six studs from the trailing arm, projecting through the brake's back plate. The notch cut out of the hub's flange doesn't index with anything on this model of car ..that I can see. Perhaps it provides clearance on the Triumph Stag / Innsbruck.? " Do up the 6 off hub studs to 16 lbs ft. Be careful here; the thread of these studs are known to be ‘suspect’. If you have any doubt about their security consider fitting the 3/8 unc stud kit." Note. nylocs were not supplied for these, but the use of new ones are strongly recommended. x12 in total (5/16 UNF) are required (as standard) for both sides. As the hub was pushed on - the shaft itself moved inwards - whereby no thread was protruding. Reaching in to behind the trailing arm allowed me to easily pull it out to get the nut on. The pair of shafts came with one plain nut and two lock nuts, the plain nut is fitted temporarily. " Now place the washer and the M22 PLAIN nut on the splined shaft and nip up. Rotate the hub and listen for any scraping noise; you are looking for any fouling of the CV boot gaiter clip on the inner of the trailing arm housing. It will be a band 69 to 75 mm from the trailing arm face. If all is ok then remove the plain M22 nut and replace with the locking M22 nut. Tighten as much as possible. Complete and check all operations." " Replace the drum and road wheel. When the car is on the ground engage the hand brake and chock the wheels. Tighten the driveshaft nut ( 32 mm AF) to 290 Nm or 215 lb ft. If your torque wrench will not go this high then it is ok to tighten to 120 lb ft, and drive a short distance to a workshop to have them tightened to the full torque setting. " Thanks to my friend Rich (...yet again !! ) who lent me his shiny new Teng_Tools torque wrench which goes upto 258 ft.lb so I could get on and do the job. However with recent upheavals I seem to have misplaced my 32mm sockets, but I have one coming tomorrow. In the meantime it's done up to 180 ft.lb. I had hoped to fit the other side as well, but a neighbour had issues with his car's headlamps, so I've postponed fitting the RH side until today. Hope the above is useful to those considering fitting these half-shafts to your car. Sorry live axle car owners - you miss out on this sort of fun. More tomorrow (hopefully), Pete
  13. agreed. The new Continental Contact CT22 tyres I fitted have a relatively chunky tread compared to many more modern / street tyres. I read the reviews before I bought, and those were on the whole favourable but that doesn't mean they best suit a TR4A on today's roads. As a life-term motorcyclist I've experienced some pretty horrid feelings from certain tyres. Not had a lot of luck with Continental tyre on any of my bikes. Thanks, Pete
  14. Yes indeed. But the clutch, in its entirety, was one of the first things I replaced when I bought Katie, as the thrust bearing fork pin had sheared, and its back-up pin had fallen out. It's a new Borg & Beck diaphragm type, fitted by myself, which has since covered less than 3000 miles. I have no reason ..either due to feel, noise, or the vibration symptoms I now feel, to suspect it (in this instance). I may be wrong of course, but I feel the engine itself (pulling unevenly) and the half-shafts are 90% of the remaining the vibration factors. The gearbox on the other hand, despite being professionally rebuilt is noisy in second and seeps oil - a poor job in which I have little confidence. Road surface is also a contributing factor on some (many !) surfaces, not least due to it being a traditional sports car, the car having a stiffer chassis-body structure, and red poly-bushes throughout its suspension's pivots. Those I'll have to live with. As Mk3Spit suggests, there may be some benefit in rebuilding the front suspension and steering, although I cannot imagine very much (with regard to vibration). Still, as the front of this car is perched at least an inch too high - I will be 'attending to' those in due course, including swapping out the springs. Harmonics from road springs are difficult to tie down, and I suspect impossible to focus on - when other assemblies are even more out of balance. Pete
  15. It's just 2,500 or so miles since Katie's wheels had new tyres which were balanced when fitted. And today I took them all off to be checked (for balance) again and trueness ..now that the tyres must have settled onto their rims fully. Surprising, to me, was that the first four garages & tyre centres I tried.. couldn't do the job for reasons of their having too much work. Another tyre centre had closed their business down. But the next garage I tried, on the same industrial estate, was empty of work .!? The chap there was most accommodating and despite each of the wheels being out of true - he seemed determined to get the best balance he could, putting on weights and where necessary removing them again to place new ones in order to get a marginally better balance. Each of the wheels that had been used (ie., aside from the spare) required between 20 and 30 grams more and on each and the balancing weights were determined to be needed about 30 degrees further around the rims. odd Cost ; £36 for the five. We also determined which of the five appeared to be running truer, and so upon returning home I refitted the better on the front, and the worst was back in the boot as the spare. Those wheels which remained on the same axle (front or back) were swapped to the other side to where they were (..yes, I had labelled each as they were removed off the car). A subsequent test drive down the A14 observed a further small but discernible improvement in (lesser) vibration, and now there's almost no wobble of the steering wheel - at any speed ..despite the particularly light steering on this car. Perhaps more significantly ; the engine vibration was clearly what it was, and similarly the rear axle vibration & its noises were more easily defined at their lower rpm. Those coincided with the frequency of the very slight flitching still detectable through the steering wheel. It's been an education to have worked through this systematically, one step at a time.. to now reach a point where each source of vibration can be pin-pointed (hopefully !) Although having the wheels rebalanced resulted in only a very small (but discernible) improvement - I rate today's efforts as a success insomuch as it clarifies the way forward ..the next task is to swap out the half-shafts. There appears to be light from the end of the tunnel. Pete
  16. The best part of 40 miles at 50mph would be one thing but when this chap in front of me insisted on toddled along at 42mph - I got grumpy and overtook ..A few minutes later, at the very next roundabout - he and the long stream of cars that followed were behind an articulated lorry ..left behind with my not_very_Christian thoughts my destination ; Norwich Cathedral . . . ^ apparently now the second tallest spire in England. In practice, the town has grown up around the Cathedral to such an extent that I had problems spotting it. Thankfully TomTom led me to the back door and parking in a very pleasant courtyard . . . "The cathedral close is one of the largest in Europe and has more people living within it than any other " ..I guess that doesn't include the Vatican ? As almost always, I drove Katie with her driver's lid off (the roof half open), but park it with that half-lid back in place. Driving in the November air was cool but still I like to see the colours of the sky and trees. I also passed by, at different stages along the route, perhaps four or five birds of prey. They're a real delight for me to spot. As a 900+ year old Cathedral and seat (with Saxon throne) of the Bishop of Norfolk for all those years, it's naturally a pretty imposing place, but nothing now to what it once must have been. It was once part of a St. Benedict monastery whose lands and buildings landscaped rather than enclosed it. Like most other religious foundations it fell to Henry VIII's dissolution of the monasteries between 1536 and 1541. The cathedral church however is still for the Church of England Diocese of Norwich ..and an active place of worshipful prayer and learning, which along with hospitality were the keystone Rules of Life of the Benedictine order. "This Norman cathedral was constructed out of flint and mortar and faced with a cream coloured Caen limestone. An Anglo-Saxon settlement and two churches were demolished to make room for the buildings. The cathedral was completed c. 1145 with the Norman tower still seen today, topped with a wooden spire covered with lead. Episodes of damage necessitated its rebuilding and the stone (96m high) spire was erected in 1480. Inside., "the ceiling bosses of Norwich Cathedral are one of the world's greatest medieval sculptural treasures that survived the iconoclasm (..widespread destruction of religious icons) of the Tudor and English civil war periods". "Combining features of ancient Roman and Byzantine buildings and other local traditions, Romanesque architecture is known by its massive quality of thick walls, round arches, sturdy pillars, barrel vaults, large towers and decorative arcading." (NB. The latter 12th century onwards Gothic style of window is easily distinguished by pointed arches). The nave's barrel / rib vaulted ceiling reflects true devotion by the stone masons, not least because at each conjunction are carved and painted bosses. Most are unique. . . "There are over 1,000 bosses in the cathedral and cloisters ; the earliest subjects are natural, mostly flowers and foliage. Then come figural representations such as green men, acrobats, mythical animals, hunting scenes and single bosses which show a story such as events from the lives of the saints. Then there are narratives which tell a story in a sequence of bosses. The nave vault shows the history of the world from the creation. Later bosses revert to foliage or formal subjects such as coats of arms. The bosses can be seen most clearly in the cloisters, where they are lower than those elsewhere. The east range has much foliage, and a sequence of the Passion of Jesus. The north range has the Resurrection and scenes of Mary, mother of Jesus and the saints. The south and west walk have the Apocalypse, as well as the Annunciation and Herod's Feast. Norwich Cathedral has the second largest cloisters in England, only exceeded by those at Salisbury Cathedral " . . . I stayed for the Cathedral's Festal Evensong - Sunday choir service, and which started off with me sitting in the South Transept. The choir itself in the crossing, by the organ (presently with scaffolding for its refurbishment * ) but I soon moved because the acoustics in the transept were awful (distorted). Instead I spent some quiet time in the ambulatory (passage around the outside of the central worship place and the Bishop's throne). listening to the choral service and taking in the wafts of incense, the ancient (c.13th) ceiling paintings and the varied details of Norman architecture. Off the Ambulatory are four small chapels, each very individual. * Organ builders Harrison and Harrison spent three weeks removing most of the organ's 6,655 pipes to be transported to Durham for further work. Once complete, the pipes will be reinstalled between January and March next year. The scaffolding will be taken down after Easter 2023 and an 11-week 'voicing period' will follow. ^ If you want to really experience medieval architecture then dusk is a very good time to do so. The drive home was in the dark, and so after 40 chilly-air miles - the pub I've adopted as my local served a welcoming Sunday roast beef followed by apple pie in a moat of custard. I came out and it was raining, so for the five miles home I dropped the driver's lid on the car. In total that's about ten miles I've now driven Katie with the roof up / on, I must either be getting soft or else my timing to avoid the rain is getting worse ..perhaps both ! That's it for another evening, I bid you a good one. Pete
  17. Rain here throughout yesterday (Sunday) morning but that cleared up for a mostly sunny afternoon. Rain again in the evening. I did get out, a bit later than I'd hoped because I forgot the car was still up on the four stands and I'd not picked up my tools from swapping the driveshaft, but still out I did get. From here in Ipswich I headed up the A14 a couple of junctions to the turn off and follow the A140 to Norwich. It's not a particularly interesting drive because of its straightness and 50mph speed limit, even on what might be considered clear and straight sections. Nevertheless the motorway speeds followed by trundling along gave me a chance to reassess Katie's pestering vibration issues. I'm glad to report that after fitting the new prop / driveshaft (..and doing nothing else) the vibration at a steady 68 - 72 mph (GPS indicated motorway speeds ) is noticeably better. ..but at the same time I'm disappointed that vibration between 45 and 58-ish now appears to be worse. As previously mentioned, I suspect the situation is a matter of alleviating one (out-of-balance / out-of-true) component, only for the resultant relative smoothness to highlight another issue. I accept that vibration can be tracked (..to an extent) by its frequency, and those in the drive-train are dependent on the gearing... Engine revs reduced by the gearbox ratio is the prop / driveshaft speed, and that is further reduced by the diff ratio to give the rear axle / half-shaft and road wheel's frequency. Switching in n' out of overdrive quickly changes the gearbox ratio / engine revs by 500prm, and dropping the clutch altogether serves to isolate (high rev) engine vibration from those coming from the drive-train &/or wheels ..well at least on smooth tarmac, which is often lacking on the roads around here. Personally I'm not at all experienced in pinpointing the source of a car's vibrations, particularly where one frequency overlaps another, and perhaps might even serve, in part, to cancel another out. However as far as I might ascertain ; the vibration I now feel is coarseness in this four-pot engine (worse between 2500 - 3000rpm). The long-stroke TR engine is inherently pretty crude and I suspect that mine is out of balance too. The question is whether this is a matter of ; component imbalance, compression imbalance, or tuning at any particular revs .?? In small but significant part, I addressed the former when I swapped the cooling-fan extension. Still I need to investigate the state of each cylinder's compression, the distributor and its auto-advance mechanism, and of course the balance of the twin carbs at any give revs. From feeling the vibration at road speed (with clutch disengaged) plus a very slight wobble of the steering wheel - I suspect that one or two of the road wheels / tyres are not in balance. Even though they were balanced when the new tyres were fitted, two-and-a-half-thousand miles ago, two of the wheels' stick-on weights simply dropped off as I delivered them up to Wolverhampton, to be fitted by M&T who did the chassis swap. As best I might, I re-stuck the weights back onto the inside of the rims in the same locality they lay in the back of my Chrysler, but I couldn't honestly say that one of those was very accurate - as I'd already lifted the wheel out of the back of the car when I spotted its strip of dropped-off weights. The outline of those balance-weights were then marked with a felt pen onto the rim, but of course by then it was too late. It's best to have them all checked again, if only to dismiss the possibility of they being the cause of vibration. These half-shafts' spline occasionally clonk as they unlock, and I discern rhythmic noise from the rear axle assembly. My friend Rich phoned me the other day to say that another of our local group has just fitted the same CV jointed half-shafts as I have to his TR - and is delighted with its now quiet smoothness. I have the half-shafts on the shelf, so that job can now be done. Of course, there may still be vibration from the diff., and/or from the cast-iron rear brake-drums being out of balance. Doing these things one step at a time isn't at all necessary but it is educational for me. Pete
  18. Measurements are taken to the mating-face side of each flange, when they are held square to the tube. This is because different manufacturers may have slightly different yoke sizes, for different ..perhaps uprated, UJ bearings. The shafts telescopic length on a IRS car is to both allow it to be contracted for fitting and then to allow the engine / gearbox and the diff to move on their mounts. Naturally it also accommodates production tolerances ..the distance between gearbox and diff flanges, as well as chassis flex as you fly over hump back bridges.! By coincident, I swapped the driveshaft on my TR4 yesterday, for a new one. < here >. I was pleasantly surprised that it came out of the tunnel without my having to dismantle the exhaust, remove the gearbox cover, or drop the diff, as some TR owners appeared to have needed to do. The shaft should have indexing marks (arrows) by the telescopic spline. The new shaft I bought specified Lithium based grease be used in the spline. As yours is presumably of an unknown age, then I'd undo the knurled cap and pull the spline apart, to clean out the old grease and refill with new. The thin straight shaft next to the spline needs to be smooth so that the grease retaining seal isn't damaged. The mating surfaces of the flanges also need to be clean and free from paint. And even if you use th. same bolts, I'd recommend you to use new nyloc nuts. Neil's suggestion is good, have it checked. And that's good pricing too. Hope that helps, Pete
  19. "Along with these I've also bought a new driveshaft / propshaft ..courtesy of Bailey & Morris, St. Neots" ..and BIG thanks to my friend Rich C-R of the TR Register's East Saxon group. . . The reason for this was what Rich describes as my 'chasing a vibration' or perhaps more accurately the cause of said annoyance .. which has been there since before I bought Katie. I know that because when I bought and originally collected her from Bury St Edmunds - this car's vibration was so bad that Rich further commented something to the effect that it was a little "embarrassing to be on an open dual carriageway and being overtaken by lorries." And at the first junction - I pulled off to check the wheels were on tight, there was no big bulge on / or the tread had part torn off a tyre (..and to investigate the engine overheating). The whole car shaked and rattled, as did the steering, the bonnet and my teeth above 60mph. Funny to think that the prior owner must have thought this acceptable. Perhaps he believed "They all do that sir" ..? My first guess as to the cause was the thick rubber white-wall-tyre embellishers. They were the first things to go ..which improved things to a degree but nowhere near enough. So I bought a set of pressed steel wheels to replace the wires and their splined hubs. I repainted the steel wheels and had new tyres fitted & balanced. This happened at the same time as the (additionally braced) chassis swap. Things got noticeably better, but still not right above 60. Next up was to measure and reset the body onto the chassis mounts, and add four more (mountings) ..which I knew wasn't the cause of the vibration, but with the car not being a unified structure - it excessively twisted and distorted along (subsided) unclassified country lanes. At the same time I swapped out the flimsy grp gearbox cover with the steel one I'd made. Again improvements were noted (..despite the dashboard brace / H-frame now not being fitted). I was now faced with fine vibration rather than the whole car shaking (except at tick-over). Next up was to replace the old half shafts - one of which the spline was worn & clonky, and the other's wheel bearing was decidedly iffy, and then the cracked trailing arm. Again a slight improvement was felt. The car had reach the point where above 62mph the vibration was felt as more of a buzz through the throttle pedal and gear knob. Then I swapped the cast iron cooling-fan-extension for the aluminium one I'd had specially made. Tick-over was much now much smoother, but that annoying vibration above 62 - 65mph persisted. Of course as I got rid of one source of vibration, then I myself was able to more finely tune into the next. Still anyone would have noted that the car still vibrates at motorway speeds. Dropping the clutch and it's still there. Aside from engine work and its tuning, I still have five obvious courses of action . . . to replace the prop / drive shaft for one which has new UJ's and is balanced ..the cheaper and easiest next move. to replace the second-hand half-shafts and hubs I'd fitted. Uncomfortable with the prospect of hub failure - I spent the kid's inheritance and bought new. And because CV jointed half shafts are said to be smoother than even coated splines, I took that option. to rebuild or replace the diff. I don't know if this would cause the vibration and since oil was put in (..after my test driving the car, post chassis swap), it's not particularly whining. to rebuild the front suspension and replace those wheel bearings. I know the front suspension needs rebuilding with new lower trunnion pins, but I'm not getting a whole lot of vibration through the (thin wooden) steering wheel, and so I think that task will do little to rid Katie of this vibration. to have the cast-iron rear brake drums re-machined (for better balance) or else replaced. I once had a Norton commando motorcycle and bought a brand new cast-iron rear brake drum for it. As i was completely restoring and rebuilding the bike I had it re-machined for balance. The engineer who did the work couldn't believe how out of balance the brand new part was. For Katie, I long ago bought a pair of aluminium Alfin brake drums - which being lighter and purpose made (rather than a mass production item) I think ought to sort that out. I've now also bought new brake shoes, so those are on the job list. I'm doing one job at a time though, just because I've so far followed a systematic approach and would like (..just out of interest) to identify and learn where the present vibration is coming from. I suspect that it won't be just one thing but, as before, will be in part be attributable to each of the above items. Today - it was the prop / driveshaft's turn to be swapped out. . . ^ the new driveshaft has indexing arrows which mark the telescopic spline's alignment. The one arrow is just by the label (which tells me to grease the spline with lithium-based grease), and the other arrow can just be seen on the casting next to the UJ joint. The old driveshaft has the indexing arrow on the tube, but for the life of me I cannot find one on the casting next to the UJ, so its assembly may have been be correctly orientated or else 180 degrees out. Before fitting this shaft, and because the satin black paint didn't seem very protective - I wiped it clean and gave it a decent coat of clear lacquer. I then let that harden overnight. Taken today, my first photo shows it now looking decidedly gloss black. Then this afternoon I undid the knurled cap and pulled the spline apart to wipe copious amounts of lithium based CV-joint grease within. I likewise pumped the same grease into the CV joints. ^ the balance weight on the new driveshaft, is typical of those I've often seen. I found no balance weight on the old shaft. up, up and away ..again ^ undoing the old driveshaft nuts was awkward but do-able. The front in particular was tight fit to get into and with a limited amount of room to work (9/16" open end spanner), which was not helped by the dampening weight I have on the back end of the overdrive casing. Oil leaks pretty apparently burnt onto the exhaust pipe. It seems as though it's mostly coming from within the bell housing, but clearly the adapter plate between the gearbox and overdrive is weeping oil too. Sausages ! Still after two and half thousand miles we have no puddles under the car (from after a drive), just an assortment of drips here and there on the thick cardboard sheets I have under there. .. I had read, after searching through the archive pages of the TR forum, that some owners had difficulty in getting their driveshafts out of their car's tunnel. And so, with the extra long T-shirt plating I'd had added to this TR4A chassis - I suspected that the centre section of the exhaust and probably also the diff would have to be dropped out of the way. I hoped not to need to remove the gearbox cover from inside the car, but that was a possibility too . . . ^ I'm very pleased to say that Katie's driveshaft came out without needing to remove, or even loosen, anything else. Delightfully uneventful ! ^ The old and the new are slightly different lengths (with the splines pushed in) but only by 6 - 8mm. The UJ's on the old were floppy but with no discernable amount of play in them, but its spline had enough torsional slack to be clearly seen and to allow it to clunk. ^ putting the new driveshaft up and through the tunnel, passed the damper, exhaust and additional chassis plating was no problem. I did try protecting the shaft from the edge of the chassis T-shirt plate with double overlaid plastic sheeting, but it didn't do anything and wasn't necessary. Getting my big hands and fat fingers up there to teh nuts was just as awkward as a lot of jobs on these cars but again quite do-able. I'd bought and used new nylocs and, for peace of mind, put those on with medium strength Loctight. With a long ring spanner on the bolt head and an open spanner, doubled in length by interlocking a ring spanner onto its other end, I tightened those nuts as much as I could. No room for a torque wrench in that tight space. Job well done ..in a very dull and cool afternoon within this poly-tunnel. I haven't tried driving the car yet, but hopefully I'll note a further improvement (less vibration) at motorways speeds. Again my BIG thanks to Rich for his help in getting the excellent quality parts I needed, and to those with experience-proven advice on the TR forum - which help me know what I might be faced with. Bidding you all a pleasant day, Pete
  20. The 1953 Sunbeam shown above, an S7-deluxe, used as a prop for this book cover, is one of the two I now have. It's unusual because the standard factory colours for this model were either pea-green or black. As it was first registered in London, the day after the Queen's coronation, it's very probable that it was at the forefront of that BSA dealer's window display for those celebrations. By coincidence, I also own its sister bike, a Sunbeam S8, likewise silver in colour, and with the same three-letter London registration prefix. It was first registered just a few weeks later. In time the bike, seen above, was owned by Mike Prior - a London photographer to celebrities. The bike was used as a prop for photographs of the Nolan Brothers, Robbie Coltrane, and Martin Glover (punk 'musician' known as 'Youth' who went on to be a successful music producer). Martin bought the bike off Mike and used it as his daily transport around London. The lad I bought the bike off was a chef living in Bristol. He didn't have a motorcycle licence but still he and his girlfriend used to go off to Wales on it. He had no idea of its history but knew it as 'Princess'. Likewise I bought it unknowing of any history but for the (unfamiliar to me) names on the buff registration document ..I bought it simply because I wanted one of this model and particularly liked the bike in silver. Still, it is nice to know a little of the bike's unique history and of its owners. Pete p.s. When I was made redundant from working with Oyster Marine (ocean-going-yacht builders) I set up in business as a specialist restorer of these post-war Sunbeams, so perhaps that little tidbit will add again to the bike's history for the future owners. I've fully restored the bike but have yet to finish its assembly.
  21. Morning all .. Katie and I didn't get out and about last weekend, most-part due to inclement weather, but today's forecast was for little chance of rain, and so again taking the opportunity while the weather is mild we went for a little drive (..as always with the roof open). I had hoped to follow the old Roman Road, between Colchester and Cambridge, to Halstead and to visit Hedingham Castle's monumental square-tower Norman keep, with its fabulous Great Hall, but checking on the internet beforehand I see it's closed at this time of year. An alternative I'd shortlisted ..but where the driving is mostly just unpleasant, was also in Essex.. Hadleigh Castle was once an awesome sight, with a strategic outlook overlooking the Thames Estuary. Built (c.1215 onwards) by Hubert de Burgh, Chief Minister & Justiciar to King John (1199 -1216). "Hubert was a trusted follower of the King (John was the one who was forced to sign the Magna Carta .. the first document to put into writing the principle that the King and his government were not above the law), and he (Hubert) was custodian of the Royal castles at Windsor and Dover. At Dover he proved his military skill by successfully defending the castle during a prolonged and fierce siege, in 1216 (disgruntled English Barons wanted to oust King John and so had offered Prince Louis of France the English crown. He in turn brought an army to quash any opposition. Although at first he succeeded in taking a number of strategic strongholds throughout SE England, Dover castle managed to hold out despite another attempt, in May 1217, and the French use of the trebuchet. Dover Castle stood as a proud symbol of English resistance to Foreign rule. Prince Louis failed and after being decisively beaten at Lincoln and then, in the August, loosing his fleet - with Hubert de Burgh’s own ship leading the attack.. he gave up on the quest). Effectively ruler of England, during young Henry III's childhood, Hubert built this large turreted castle at Hadleigh as a statement of his power. His success came to an end after quarrels with the king. As a result he forfeited his lands, including Hadleigh in 1239." So although Hubert knew a thing or two about castles, the site of Hadleigh was an unfortunately unstable foundation. In short, the soil moved under the weight of stone and things started to fall apart (literally). He was loyal to the throne, a valiant general, and had spent a fortune on building the castle ..only to loose it twenty years later, to the throne. Things don't seem to change much in politics ..except that it happens very much more quickly nowadays It's a 50-mile drive to Hadleigh from the north side of Ipswich, and the drive was 'orrid. The A12 came to a standstill, the amount of Essex traffic was extraordinary, and many drivers lived up to their reputation of always having something to prove. I didn't want to drive all the way there and back on motorway & dual carriageways so I dialed-in a route via Maldon. That only succeeded in landing me in the midst of traffic queues for Sainsbury's and B&Q. ..Seriously don't these people know that the film The Matrix was pretty much about them ? Anyway, going that way did find me signposted to Layer Marney Tower. I had heard of it, but couldn't remember what I read. Still as I was passing nearby - I thought I'd go and have a look. . . ^ It looks a nice place to visit, but as the sign says 'closed' . . . ^ ah yes, I remember .. an unusually grand (over-powering in size) Tudor gatehouse ..to a manor house. Not a period in history of particular interest to me but nevertheless magnificent brickwork ..and I liked the guard rams in the driveway. Moving onwards and upwards I reached my destination .. in the fog. . . ^ The view from this elevated location overlooking the Thames Estuary were spectacular too. But.., there's always a bright side to life . . . ^ That rather little white dot in the sky is the sun. However, looking straight upwards were clear blue skies.. And so although we were pretty high up ( for East Anglia) it was but a sea-mist that had likewise come to visit the castle. And like all visitors, sooner or later they leave . . . ^ literally just half an hour later, the mist had all but dispersed and it was a beautiful day. As previously said, the geology of site was unsuitable for a castle with immensely thick stone walls, and so despite being rebuilt several times, over the next couple of centuries, and being a favourite of King Edward III - the towers leaned over and crumbled, and the south wall, complete with foundations tumbled down the hill. By the 18th centuryit was a derelict ruin but the curtain wall was still an enclosure, and the north west towers was both still mostly there. Not long ago, from the air, it looked like this. . . www.geoessex.org.uk ^ as you can see, referencing the scale of the people.. it was a pretty big place. And seeing as it wasn't built by the crown or for the crown, it's certainly a statement with regard to the wealth of this man - Hubert de Burgh. Rather like Framlingham Castle, in Suffolk, Hadleigh castle was built as an enclosure ..a curtain wall with towers and ramparts, but without a keep. The principle accommodation were great halls and numerous buildings, stables, and workshops built within. The original towers appeared to have been smaller square ones, as seen to the right of the picture below, whereas the huge round towers and the barbican gatehouse are thought to have been built by Edward III (around 1360 - 70), as these reflect the advanced designs in military architecture. for King Edward III, at that later date, it probably looked something like this . . . ^ Overlooking marshland, then Benfleet Creek and the coastline of Canvey Island, Hadleigh Ray (estuary) over to the Thames it was a commanding position and statement of military power. Today, after the mist had cleared, I took these . . . ^ Round towers were expensive to build and less accommodating than the early Norman square towers, but they were a stronger defense against undermining (and subsidence). Large halls on three levels provide luxurious accommodation, with a garderobe and latrine on each floor, as well as each with their own generous fireplace and windows.. In the second photo you might just make out the grey silhouette of a huge container ship on the horizon (just to the left of the tower) as it steams up and into the Thames estuary, most likely bound for Tilbury docks. ^ detail of the chimney from the lower two floors, the third floor had their fireplace against another wall. ..And the graffiti of names and dates scratched into the soft stones of the remaining window alcoves. You'll note that most of the letters are scratched complete with serifs, and even just a quick looks reveals the dates 1849, 1853, and so forth ..quite fascinating. ^ Looking across to Canvey Island and beyond. The weather turned out to be a nice afternoon and evening. And the drive home, again via Maldon, turned out to be a good run with the sun behind us. Bidding you pleasant classic Triumph motoring with sun on your backs too. And of course .. a good day, Pete
  22. I dropped the seller a message this morning to express my enthusiasm for his TR6 V8 and thanks ..but I'll not be pursuing the purchase. As explained I like driving Katie (..despite the long list of jobs yet to be done) and have too many unfinished projects (including Katie ). Unfinished projects make me unhappy. And having another, albeit said to be ready to go "with no outstanding issues", would still need to be 'adjusted' to accommodate my size and tastes, and otherwise be a distraction to my getting on with those that persistently nag in the back of my mind. He replied to suggest that he was quite relieved , as he (despite a good number of enquiries) has thought about it and again is inclined to keep her. So there we are, I was sorely tempted, but resisted. Peace prevails . . . Pete
  23. Back on the subject of Katie, rather than boats, I have to confess that I'm being pulled by the dark side of the force .. actually a 1971 British Racing (very dark) green TR6, with V8 motive power. Although an old restoration (1997), and an even older (1982) conversion to the Rover 3500 power plant, the car appears (from description, and subsequent conversation with the seller (owner since 2011), and the few photos I've yet seen) to be in exceptionally good order. It being stored in a Carcoon for six winter months each year I think has very much to do with this. This particular TR6_v8 is obviously not for the purist, but having previously owned and relished the burble of a V8 (2.5 ltr Daimler), this 3-1/2 litre TR6 would be something that ticks many of my own boxes. I've several times thought of converting Katie to use the Daimler's 140-bhp V8 lump, but I've still got a host of other jobs to do before that comes to the forefront. The TR6's BRG colour is to my taste, as are the heated Mx5 leather seats (w/ separate headrests), its (Pete Cox rebuilt) Stag gearbox (with 28% overdrive) and diff, plus the uprated CV jointed half-shafts. The motor is not hotly tuned but was polish ported, has a viper-hurricane cam, and an Edelbrock 4-barrel carb (from the U.S. of A). It's is thought to offer around 170_bhp (to the road) but more tuned for oodles of torque, being driven through black minilite wheels. Dual carriageway cruising of between 65 and 70 mph is said to return almost 30 mpg. The car also is also fitted with an original aluminium framed TR4 Surrey-top back-light. The aluminium Rover engine would be much the same weight as the TR4 four cylinder cast iron lump, so handling and weight distribution of the car should not be upset by the apparent increase in size. Still the car's front brakes have been uprated to four-pot (specialist supplied but possibly derived from Toyota) plus servo, and its suspension dampers are also firmer. I'm not sure about these, nor the car being 1" lower all round, as I don't want a jerky ride for touring, but really that can only be assessed by the seat of my pants. All in all quite a package, and for less than what I've already spent on Katie, which as I say is demanding still more time and attention yet, although I have now bought most of the expensive parts needed. I have a few issue though which hold me back (..aside from my concerns about the harshness of ride with the lowered suspension) and those are 1. I have an emotional attachment to Katie (sounds foolishly sentimental but I never claimed not to be ! ) 2. that I much prefer the 1960's styling of the TR4 to the TR6's 1970's hairy-chest image ..I like the look of Katie just as she is. 3. I've spent a whole lot of effort creating a decent chassis and extra stiffness through the steel g/box cover, as well as the addition space inside. and 4. that with Katie I do now have a good idea of what yet needs to be done (..another couple of thousand + 6 months work !). Even then, she'll be ten miles away from being concourse ..And that in itself is attractive to me. Rightly or wrongly I feel that perhaps the TR6 is too tidy for a scruffy old duffer like me.! The attraction of the TR6 is in the V8 burble, the oodles of torque for my aspirations of lazy long-legged grand-touring, The fact that it is said to be already sorted, whereas Katie is still demanding, and that I suspect (judging by the panel fits) that the TR6 was previously very much more carefully restored. And Katie will never be correct unless she's pulled apart and done again. Emotions mixed with practicalities.. As one old fart to another - What do you reckon ? Pete The dark side pulls strongly
×
×
  • Create New...