-
Posts
802 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
21
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Events
Posts posted by Darren Groves
-
-
Good advice guys, thank you.
I changed from K&N's back to standard Air Filter box when I went from HS2's to HS4's to get the cool air flow as Pete mentions.
I'm liking your idea Clive, got any pics of your converted airbox?
-
So what are people's opinions on fitting Ram Pipes with mesh covers in place of the standard air filter box or K&N type filters?
-
Or try: http://www.longstonetyres.co.uk/ they specialise in tyres for classics, they can advise on the best available.
- 1
-
Not that I'm a big user of Rimmers (usually Canley's or JP), but they do price match. Can be done online and their response is normally quite quick, so maybe worth a try also.
-
Hi Pete,
Thanks for the reply.
I re-torqued this morning after about 60 miles of so, was planning to do again after a few hundred. Valve clearances had closed a little afterwards, so all reset. Done another 30 miles or so since and thought I'd have a look over the engine for leaks etc. as you do. I did notice a glistening of what I assume must be oil between the mating faces of block & head. Now this has been a trait of this engine and head combination, has been a bit of a losing battle for it to be relatively oil tight, unlike my previous lump which was pretty good until it went bang!
I like to worry
-
So the engine is all back together and running fine. With the cause of the premature failure still a bit of a mystery, Pete's suggestion of under-torqued was a good one, but as the wrench I use tested OK this seems unlikely.
Assuming that the Payen Head Gasket was of sufficient quality, I can't help pondering why it failed early. Now the head was skimmed a fair amount to raise the CR to be better suited to the Fast Road Cam, so it's flatness is pretty assured, BUT what I didn't do was have the block skimmed. So what are peoples opinions that it could be due to the top of the block not being 100% flat and should this be done as a matter of course?
-
I've done it on the car before, some years ago but remember it to be pretty straightforward.
- 1
-
Just tested the electronic Torque Wrench I always use, I hung a 22.560lb weight at 14" (1.166ft) from the centre of the drive. 22.56 x 1.166 = 26.3185 lb-ft, the wrench read 26.4lb-ft so well within tolerance. Worth doing, at least I can be sure it will be set correctly.
Just out of interest I dug out my old 'clicky' one I used to use, that was under reading by just over 20%.
-
Darren, Pete i totally agree but the rim is 14 x 6J. How can or why would someone put on a 13 inch rim on a 14 inch. Perhaps the picture can shed some light and confirm what ive got from the advert on ebay.
http://www.ebay.co.uk/itm/252316652840?ssPageName=STRK:MESELX:IT&_trksid=p3984.m1555.l2649
Thanks
That must of taken some doing....scary
-
Rich - can you post a picture of the tyre bead/wheel rim. I would love to see how someone has fitted a 13" tyre to a 14" rim....
-
In fairness it was not an electronic wrench, which is the preferred item these days for accuracy.
Thanks for the replies guys.
The torque-wrench I use is electronic, it buzzes & vibrates, no clicking! Are we saying that electronic ones are more accurate and less in need of calibrating?
-
Hi Pete,
I guess under-torqued is a possibility, though I did re-torque twice after the initial fit with a decent quality Snap-on wrench.
I guess the fact it's bored out to +60 only makes a weak spot weaker again.
Will refit once the new HG has arrived, hopefully just gremlins. If it happens again I will reassess.
Darren
-
So after only 11 months & 4000 miles my head gasket has blown between No.1 & No.2 cylinder. The gasket was a Payen, so quality should be fine.
The engine is modified, but nothing nothing too drastic. Bored out to +60, fast road cam, larger valves and CR around 9.6:1.
Any reason why is should fail where it did, or just bad luck? -
There's a school of thought that the re-torque should be done after just one or two cycles of the engine being run up to operating temperature, then being allowed to cool.
The last time I done it after around 100 miles, then again after a further 200 or so.
-
Darren many thanks for all you great advice, did you have to cut down the m12 studs prior to fitting the minilites or were they long enough?
Regards
Rich
Hi Rich,
No need to trim mine down, they were perfect i length. Best to check when you've inserted the first new stud as if you do need to shorten them it'll be easier off the car.
Cheers
Darren
-
-
-
Hi Rich,
Below is a useful chart, will help you make a decision on the tyres. You also need to consider circumference, you can compare here: http://www.willtheyfit.com/
JBW supplied closed end wheel nuts, you just need to ensure they don't bottom out if you're fitting the longer studs, shave a bit off if they do. I did buy a set of locking wheel nuts as well, but decided not to use them in the end.
Darren
Rim width Minimum tyre width Ideal tyre width Maximum tyre width
5,0 Inches 155 mm 165 or 175 mm 185 mm
5,5 Inches 165 mm 175 or 185 mm 195 mm
-
Hi Rich,
Are you going for genuine Minilites of the JBW ones? One supplier recommended ET25, which would have brought the tyre further inboard, everywhere else said ET20, personally I would go for ET20 as that brings the wheels outward. I ended up going direct to JBW, they price matched an online trader and we're happy to supply the M12 wheel nuts, one supplier flatly refused to do this.
I have 165/70/13's on my 5J wheels, your 165/65's will be absolutely fine, you could go up to 175's if you wanted, but I wouldn't go any bigger than that.
Darren
-
Hi Rich,
I just fitted 13 x 5J's to my Herald with an offset of ET20, so these should be a straight swap for your Vitesse also.You might want to read this thread: http://forum.tssc.org.uk/index.php?/topic/1211-alloy-wheel-offset/?hl=offset a wheel stud upgrade is recommended.
If you want a little more detail on how it's done, look here: http://triumphherald1360.blogspot.co.uk/2016/02/wheel-stud-upgrade.html
Darren
-
Don't be too keen on splashing the cash. I could kick myself for wasting so much money.
I was hoping just to do it for the cost of a new shaft, so I think I'll just do that and polish the slight indents of of the tips, it's going to be better than what I have.
Thanks to all.
- 1
-
Definitely a new shaft, but if you move the rockers onto an unused part of the shaft there is still some play, not huge, but there. Is a small amount of play normal or does that indicate worn rockers also?
-
You should be able to assess the rocker wear by sliding it along to another none worn part of the shaft.
I did do that, there was some play, but not a huge amount though it could be felt. What is considered acceptable?
-
I stripped down my spare rocker shaft today as I was going to refurb to replace the one on the car. The shaft has signs of wear so I was going to replace that as they're fairly cheap. If the shaft is worn, does this mean the actual rockers will be too or does the majority of the wear happen on the shaft? Is it a bad idea to fit old rockers on a new shaft or doesn't matter?
Rev Drop with Lights on
in Electrical System
Posted
So when I turn my lights on there is a significant drop in revs, approx 150rpm is that normal? Makes setting a happy idle speed for both day & night time troublesome.
I have a 45amp Lucas alternator, battery volts are fairly constant 14v whether at idle or higher revs, very small drop when lights are switched on so alternator & battery seem to cope with it OK. Lights have standard H4 halogen bulbs.
Any thoughts?