KevinR
-
Posts
1,220 -
Joined
-
Days Won
53
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Blogs
Gallery
Downloads
Store
Events
Posts posted by KevinR
-
-
1 hour ago, ahebron said:
The only advice I give on buying tools is if I need it once then I buy it.
Yes it is a horrid malady to have.That's very good advice !
Even better advice is "If you think you might need it sometime in the next 50 years then buy it"
You'd be surprised how many times you then find the perfect tool in the tool box to perform the unexpected job.
-
2
-
-
DVLA says that the tax was due 1 April 1988, and last V5 issued 1 July 1987.
Some things to bear in mind :
1. This predates the need to declare SORN - SORN came in in 1997.
2. This predates the automatic expiry of car tax on change of keeper, so when sold, the new keeper got the balance of the tax remaining.
3. This predates the time when scrapped vehicles were removed from the DVLA computer.
4. This predates the online MOT records.
5. This predates details of vehicles being exported being recorded as exported on the DVLA system (ignore the "export marker")
Therefore, its possible that :
a) you sold it in at the end of June, 1st July 1987, with 9 months road tax remaining.
b) The new owner drove it until the tax expired and then scrapped.
c) The new owner drove it until the tax expired and then put it in a barn where it has remained ever since.
d) The new owner exported it and its running about somewhere in a foreign country
-
3 hours ago, johny said:
I thought one of the great things with polybush was the stainless steel sleeve that avoided the problem of them rusting onto the bolt and having to be cut out. I would certainly be interested in any of the trunnion kits that has the original plastic bushes but with stainless sleeves so getting this benefit without the expense of silicone👍
Using stainless steel sleeves will not stop the corrosion, it will just change the source of the corrosion, and may make it worse.
The only guaranteed way to stop the corrosion is to also use stainless steel bolts - and that is a VERY BAD idea and should not be done.
The problem of dissimilar metals is Galvanic corrosion.
The further apart the metals are on the the scale, the worse the corrosion.
To minimise galvanic corrosion, you really need to keep the potential difference less than 0.1V
Using a good high quality highly water repellent grease, such as Molykote Longterm W2 in the sleeve will help minimise corrosion.
Under no circumstances should one use copper grease.
-
First point I notice is that you are crimping a blue crimp with the red jaw, not the blue jaw, so you are probably putting too much pressure on the crimp.
Second, it looks like you didnt start with a cleanly stripped wire
Third, I'm not confident about the state of the jaws on the crimping tool you are using.
Below are some pictures of my crimp tool, and its jaws - note, I dont have to worry which side of the tool the wire goes.
Then there is a picture of the prepared wire and the end result - a very strong serviceable crimp
-
If you are looking for quality crimps, then you need to look at PIGD (Pre-Insulated Diamond Grip) crimps.
https://www.te.com/usa-en/products/brands/pidg.html?tab=pgp-story
They are qualified for aerospace applications, where high vibration is a given - I've never had one fail.
-
51 minutes ago, chrishawley said:
With the Eclipse tool it's mostly lack of any real secure grip on the wire even if the strands are folded back. With the 'stripping' type tool it's grip at the expense of a mangled blue bit (mostly blues I'm using) all crushed and flattened. Looks appalling!
some pictures of your problem crimps and the crimp tools would be useful to try and suggest alternatives
I use these https://www.toolstop.co.uk/eclipse-ect-rby-ratchet-crimping-pliers-p73609/ without a problem
-
On 18/02/2024 at 12:12, Steve P said:
How could it be 1978 first registered on an S plate 10 years after coming off the line??
S
Back in the late 70’s, a car got a current plate when first registered, regardless of its year of manufacture.
There are thousands of RHD cars that were bought here by British Military personnel based in Germany, and driven from new on BFG “B” plates before being brought back to the UK at the end of a posting and getting a current plate.
My parents were responsible for bringing back several 1970 Morris Travellers (ex Military) and putting them on S plates.
-
Don't you just love previous owners !
-
1 hour ago, Mjit said:
I'd go the other way actually, bolting the hard top down at the back, loosening the windscreen frame, and moving the frame to just/snugly fit the hard top. Do that and chances are when you wind the windows up they will be in the correct place.
The problem with that approach is that it wont identify if the complete body tub has sagged due to incorrect sill replacement at some time in the car's past
-
Adjusting the screen to get the rake correct will enable the windows to be closed properly, so if driving in the wet, or on a windy day the driver and passenger can get some side on weather protection.
It will also affect the tension of the soft top, and in the extreme, with a soft top that has shrunk a bit, will mean that it is too tight to fit - there may be a bit of movement at the back to help, but it may need a good sunny day to soften the material to get it to stretch to fit.
It's a big 3D jigsaw puzzle, and making one adjustment will throw out other things, but its a necessary evil in order to get it all sorted.
Start with getting the screen rake correct and then deal with the consequences as they arrive.
-
As revealed by winding the windows up, the windscreen is tipped back too far.
On the MKIII Spitfire, the rake of the windscreen is adjustable - fittings inside the A posts.
Before tackling the hard top, you need to correct the rake of the screen.
This will involve loosening the fittings inside the A posts and the tipping the screen forward until you can wind the windows fully up and get a uniform gap between the glass and the windscreen frame.
Once this is done, the hard top should fit correctly.
Changing the capping from early to late should be fairly simple, but then the soft top will also need changing.
I've never done it, but there must be a way of fitting a hard top with the early soft top fittings - I'll let a MKIII owner chop in with the answer.
-
I'd want to check that the rake of the windscreen surround is correct.
Any chance of a photo with the windows wound fully up ?
Also, note that the top of the windscreen has the early MKIII soft top fittings, and not the ones used on the later MKIII cars.
-
1
-
-
It's NOT a scam, its a message for all Forum members to be alert for a scammer pretending to be Nuala trying to scam money.
Below is the warning you get if you click on the link in the header.
A warning to ignore Facebook friend requests from Nuala Dowie
Many of you will know this legend of engine tuning who died last year, a regular at Classic Le Mans.
Some scammer has recreated her account and is pushing a sweepstakes scam
-
The engine should look something like this
If it looks like this, then its an American style installation that used a single Stromberg instead of twin SU carbs.
-
The adapters the Clive used to sell were the WIX 24037 adapter.
They usually came from Rock Auto in the USA and cost about $5 each - but the postage to the UK was the killer.
It looks like WIX has discontinued them, so any that are left in the supply chain will probably sell for a premium.
2 sellers on Ebay at the moment, one at $60 each and the other at $21.20 each - and both of them probably wont post to the UK
-
The joint on the sill with the A post was brazed in the factory as it couldn't be spot welded
-
1 hour ago, dougbgt6 said:
The bald guy.
No, that's Seal
-
3 hours ago, dougbgt6 said:
But have you ever seen them in the same room together?
Doug
-
2
-
-
John
I could remove all spam controls and just let it run rampant like the TR-Register forum, and then within a few hours you would be pleading to have the controls re-instated.its a simple choice, rampant spam or the occasional “banned” message.
think yourself lucky you don’t try to access the forum from Russia or China - most of the spam bots are based in these two countries, so they feature very significantly in the banned IP list.
-
John,
You (personally) have never been banned from the TSSC Forum.
As a Forum, we are under incessant attack from spammers, and I have to spend several hours a week keeping on top of their attempted registrations.
To try and block spammers, we also ban IP addresses that have a history of being the source of spammers attempting to register on the forum.
The IP address are allocated to your computer by your Internet Service provider, and the one that your computer selected yesterday (probably on your mobile phone as its a Vodaphone IP address) has an extensive history of being used for attacking forums. It was added to the TSSC Forum banned list September this year, and the cleantalk.org logs for this IP address show that it was still being used as a source of spam as recently as the 11th December - You were allocated it on the 12th December for a short period of time, before you were allocated another one for the rest of the day (or a different device). You have now been allocated yet another IP address.
So if you get a message that you are "banned" because you have inadvertently been allocated an IP address that is often allocated to someone that sends out spam, then you will know immediately you try and access the forum.
If on the other hand, you can access the forum, but it wont let you do anything - then you have been personally banned - and you will get a message that lets you know. And for avoidance of doubt, NO you have NOT been personally banned.
If you find you are IP address banned, then simply switch off your router and switch it on again and it will be allocated a new IP address that is probably not on the banned list.
-
3
-
-
In John's original link, they were clearly UNC - as per the description https://arthurbeale.co.uk/products/silicon-bronze-nuts?currency=GBP&variant=35997872095390&stkn=6486993b0c0f&gclid=Cj0KCQiAgqGrBhDtARIsAM5s0_k3xor9WHORcIw1pZJh2nqa7V2JWk-GcA499gIQwlRtXRCX4pgUBKMaAtDKEALw_wcB
I suspect that they are also UNC in the 2nd link, as all the bolts listed to go with the nuts are UNC, but the listing is really confusing - https://www.classic-marine.co.uk/product-category/silicone-bronze-screws-copper-nails/bronze-fasteners/
-
1
-
-
Pretty certain we are talking about the studs that join the manifold to the exhaust, which are supposed to be UNC where they screw into the manifold and UNF where the nuts fit, hence the suggestion going UNC UNC.
For the studs in the cylinder head they are supposed to be UNF UNF, and as UNF UNC are readily available they are an easy swap to be able to use bronze nuts there too.
-
1 hour ago, JohnD said:
Look for Bronze nuts 5/16" imperial : Silicon Bronze Nuts (UNC thread) (arthurbeale.co.uk) 50p each.
John
John,
I think that the challenge is to get 5/16" UNF bronze nut, rather than UNC.
Having said that, it may actually be easier to get some 5/16" studs with a UNC thread on both ends.
-
1 hour ago, Puglet1 said:
Sorry, but I am confused. Does this happen on all of the small chassis triumph models?
Does this happen on Mk2 Vitesse with the original rotaflex shafts fitted?
Theoretically, it can happen to ANY car, not just Triumphs.
Unfortunately it is rather too prevalent on the "Small Chassis" Triumphs where the drive shaft itself is also one of the suspension arms, as they are very highly stressed.
The drive shafts on Rotaflex (and CV conversion) cars are not part of the suspension, so the failure is unlikely to occur (but not impossible)
-
1
-
Air intake
in Fuel System
Posted
Original thread restored