Jump to content

A Few More Beans


RayHutch

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Colin Lindsay said:

So we're talking about replacing the original Triumph engine with a modern? (Hits Clive an exasperated slap) It's hardly fair to compare the BHP then, or any other characteristic. I'm sure my Mondeo is more comfortable and certainly quieter than my GT6, and better suited to long journeys. It won't help the OP get more power out of a Vitesse engine, though... :)

Nope. You are confusing the two facts?

The engine makes no odds really, it was dead noisy with the twin tailpipe wheelbarrow exhaust. In fact, the car looks and sounds like a fairly normal spitfire. What I am saying is that it is possible to modify a spitfire, or any other Triumph, with thought and experience (usually pilfered or paid for!) and still be reasonably quiet. It is just that most people seem to think a noisy exhaust =power gains. It is just that the ford engine produces power quite cheaply, and it won't break.

And I did mention the other spit we own, which is a mk3, with a modified mk3 engine (head, cams, roller rockers, pair of dellortos) and that 1300 produces approx 120bhp, shaming GT6's. Especially in the twisty bits. Again not particularly noisy, except the roller rockers/cam clearances. They are double that of the std cam.

As to comfort, that has absolutely nothing to do with the engine swap as the engine is the exact same weight. It is down to spring/shock choice, though I do want a slightly stiffer rear spring, but shocks (koni) are excellent. It is still a spitfire, with spitfire chassis, suspension etc etc, just thought out, and well set up. It is not a mondeo or anything like one. (put a spitfire engine in a mondeo, it will still be a comfortable mondeo. Just rather slow)

And all that was just part of the idea that any modifications on any car need to be carefully thought out, so they work together correctly. And need setting up/optimised. THAT will get more power. And better handling if the same principles are applied.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 14/02/2019 at 12:41, clive said:

ST170 (which is a zetec with a few improvements). Absolutely bombproof. Trust me, I have tried😂 And not exactly new, being over 25 years old!! In fact, it is only 12 years newer than the last spitfire engines made. Scary thought that engine design improved that much between those dates, though to be fair the Triumph engine was rather long in the tooth at that point. 

We sponsor a racing car at work and it had a 2l duratec engine until 2 years ago when they fitted a fiesta engine. 1.2l I think it is. It is forced induction but is producing about 350bhp and there is room for more apparently. Bit different to the power our standard engine make!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Anyway, moving on .................................................

 

If you do decide to use the Novatech  RR or another outlet, Ray, it will be good to hear how you get on and what the outcome is.

Regards.

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 13/02/2019 at 21:10, classiclife said:

This company may be able to assist, no personal knowledge - just did a Google search for RR Berkshire:

http://novatech.info/

Worth a call to ascertain their worth............... seem classic car focused.

Good luck.

Richard.

They look interesting,i have been looking for someone to have a go at my 2.5 Vitesse when i fit the 123-Tune.

Only 15 minutes from me.(and the original poster)

Steve

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Anglefire said:

I'm sure would find one, but then you don't know what they are like!

Hello Mark,

Any recommendations from TSSC members in your local club meet areas ??

Regards.

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have had moderate success with this in the past, Mark, although not a comprehensive directory.

https://www.rollingroadregister.com/

There also appears to be a company in Shirley B90 (Weston Performance) - but cannot seem to get a trace, they may have gone under.

Failing that there is RRS in Stourbridge, not sure how geographically convenient that is to you and of course do they do classics albeit they have 3x Ford Escorts in one of their gallery photographs ?? As with Ray, probably worth a call at least.

https://www.rrsrollingroadservices.co.uk/

Regards.

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Shirley is where I live! 

Well, that was a bit of a shock - Googled and there was a link to WestonPerformanceCars. Unless you are very broad minded, don't go to the link.................. As often said, NSFW!

Drayton Road is about 10minutes walk from home - and I can't see it there now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to show the OP what can be achieved, my GT6 2 litre was producing 85 bhp on the rolling road. But, long story, someone had put a 2.5 cylinder head on it without increasing the CR so it was running a very low CR and had 100,000 miles of wear. Having said that the rolling road guy said most standard 2 litres struggle to break 90 bhp.

When Mark from Jigsaw rebuilt it we had to use a different block and head, it had the 25/65 cam which is good for the road. The head was gas flowed and and ported iirc I think went for just under 10:1 compression ratio. I've got a 6 3 1 stainless exhaust manifold and system which looks lovely. It was fully balanced and then rolling road setup with the original strombergs and standard cold air intake.

Very pleased with 115 bhp which makes a big difference. Being nicely balanced it feels silky smooth as well.

You could do that fairly cheaply although it cost me a fair bit as a kept adding things such as electronic ignition, brand new clutch, new slave and master cylinder etc etc.

So I think a couple of thousand, if you did it yourself and had it rolling roaded, would see up from 88-95 bhp to 110-115 bhp which would certainly be noticeable.

To go much more would start costing big bucks and would start to loose originality. Mine lloks completely standard just goes better and smoother and has the gt6 howl still.

I might be tempted at some stage to go to twin SUs and maybe a more extreme cam as I think you could get to 130 ish with standard internals fairly easily.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, brian GT6. said:

. But, long story, someone had put a 2.5 cylinder head on it without increasing the CR

 

 

Actually the long story is that it must have been triumph. I've got the full history file of the car as i am the second owner. The engine was replaced under warranty in the first year by the Triumph dealer, so I can only assume that Triumph just sent them whatever they had spare at the time. Maybe they were short of engines and stuck a 2.5 head on a 2 litre block? Who knows.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

25 minutes ago, Pete Lewis said:

cant tune a  Stromberg !!!!!

Hello Pete,

That's not an uncommon response from many garages these days even on some rolling roads, of which I agree the latter is quite odd. I believe that as time goes on, the skills gap between classic and modern knowledge / know-how will only increase. Classic car wizardry on the commercial front is on the wane unless the business is specifically dealing with classic vehicles, hence the importance of keeping such skills alive to keep passing on up for decades to come.

Regards.

Richard.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Pete Lewis said:

Im pleased to remain a dinosaurus  !!!

 

2 hours ago, classiclife said:

The beast is irrelevant - it's the brain that counts !!

Some dinosaurs had two brains, there heads were so far from there tails there had to be another nerve centre nearer the tail. I'm sure there's a joke there, somewhere.

db

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...