Jump to content

Fox engine rebuild


wimpus

Recommended Posts

Hi all, 

 

I've been planning an engine rebuild on my Spit 1500 engine with 324.000kms/201.000miles.

 

Its using a fair bit of oil.

Last year changed the head etc.

It needs a re-bore, crank re-grind etc.

 

Soo.. 

 

Been thinking of fitting an MK3 profile cam.

What are the positive and negative things fitting it? 

Also pistons, what are the best to use ? county, nüral ? 

Bearings: county 3 metal, glyco ? 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Not many disadvantes to the mk3 cam, it is just a bit "warmer" but not "hot". It was used on 2.5 engines so will be fine with a 1500 which is broadly similar.

Bearings, if you can find VP2, they would be best. If not, glyco/AE/glacier, then county. Pistons, I believe county are fine. Got some here for a TR7, the company who did the rebore were happy with them, all measured identical diameter, and very close on weight, well within limits. 

  • Thanks 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, clive said:

Not many disadvantes to the mk3 cam, it is just a bit "warmer" but not "hot". It was used on 2.5 engines so will be fine with a 1500 which is broadly similar.

Bearings, if you can find VP2, they would be best. If not, glyco/AE/glacier, then county. Pistons, I believe county are fine. Got some here for a TR7, the company who did the rebore were happy with them, all measured identical diameter, and very close on weight, well within limits. 

+1

The Mk3 cam profile is the best for road use. More at the top end than other factory cam profiles, with no significant loss of of low down torque. I've used County bearings and pistons, which seem fine. There have been past concerns about dimensional consistency of County pistons. I used them for a 6 cylinder engine rebuild two years ago. When my trusted machinist measured the new pistons they were all very, very similar.

Nigel

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, clive said:

Not many disadvantes to the mk3 cam, it is just a bit "warmer" but not "hot". It was used on 2.5 engines so will be fine with a 1500 which is broadly similar.

Bearings, if you can find VP2, they would be best. If not, glyco/AE/glacier, then county. Pistons, I believe county are fine. Got some here for a TR7, the company who did the rebore were happy with them, all measured identical diameter, and very close on weight, well within limits. 

Seen a dutch supplier selling re-grounded cams to mk3 profile.

Would that be trusted ? 

 

I had the bearing numbers om my friend his TR6 build, the machine shop ordered Nüral pistons and Glyco bearings.

So got the part no.

Sadly non to find..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, wimpus said:

Seen a dutch supplier selling re-grounded cams to mk3 profile.

Would that be trusted ? 

 

I had the bearing numbers om my friend his TR6 build, the machine shop ordered Nüral pistons and Glyco bearings.

So got the part no.

Sadly non to find..

Best to get a cam that has been ground on a brand new blank,  from a reputable supplier. Reprofiling a worn cam as the surface hardening will be thin,  risking rapid wear.

Nigel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nigel Clark said:

Best to get a cam that has been ground on a brand new blank,  from a reputable supplier. Reprofiling a worn cam as the surface hardening will be thin,  risking rapid wear.

Nigel

Ok, will contact the seller.

Otherwise I will need to stick with my standard one... thanks to brexit.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, clive said:

Newman cams produce some high quality stuff, including followers. 

But again in the UK...

What about Bastuk?

Had a look on newman cams and bastuck.

 

Ph1 of newman is pretty close to mk3 spec.

 

But again bastuck doesnt sell anything like mk3 cam that fits in a 1500.

 

Only mk3 cams with cam bearings.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I may be wrong but wouldn't putting bearings in the 1500 block mean that you can use a mk3 small journal cam. In the early mk2 the cam ran directly in the block, they then bored the block to accept bearings with the same cam (identical to mk3) then during the mk4 run they stopped using bearings and used a cam with bigger journals to fit the block.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, DanMi said:

I may be wrong but wouldn't putting bearings in the 1500 block mean that you can use a mk3 small journal cam. In the early mk2 the cam ran directly in the block, they then bored the block to accept bearings with the same cam (identical to mk3) then during the mk4 run they stopped using bearings and used a cam with bigger journals to fit the block.

Yes i know that I could use cam bearings.

But in my opinion, another thing that can go wrong..

 

As I do a lot of kms/miles, want it 'sort off' bullet proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 30/06/2021 at 09:01, clive said:

Not many disadvantes to the mk3 cam, it is just a bit "warmer" but not "hot". It was used on 2.5 engines so will be fine with a 1500 which is broadly similar.

It has the same valve timing as the TR5/early 6? 

I as as I was considering this cam profile for my MkII Vitesse,  but was concerned that I'd loose the smooth idle and low down torque.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Peaks said:

It has the same valve timing as the TR5/early 6? 

I as as I was considering this cam profile for my MkII Vitesse,  but was concerned that I'd loose the smooth idle and low down torque.

No, it's the same as the later TR6 PI (CR series). Has less dwell than the early TR6.

Nigel

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, wimpus said:

Yes i know that I could use cam bearings.

But in my opinion, another thing that can go wrong..

 

As I do a lot of kms/miles, want it 'sort off' bullet proof.

I would have thought it would be no less reliable with Cam bearings, especially as original is for cam to run in the block itself.

do not be tempted to fit stronger valve springs.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/07/2021 at 22:22, thescrapman said:

I would have thought it would be no less reliable with Cam bearings, especially as original is for cam to run in the block itself.

do not be tempted to fit stronger valve springs.

Colin, I do now have double valve springs are original 1500 spec.

Would this still be good ? 🤔

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 01/07/2021 at 15:10, Nigel Clark said:

No, it's the same as the later TR6 PI (CR series). Has less dwell than the early TR6.

No, it’s the same 25/75 profile as used for the Mk2 Vitesse/GT6 and Mk1/early Mk2 PI saloons. 308778 cam for the 6cyl. 

Good all-round road cam that works well with CD carbs (TR5/early 6, not so much, too much overlap)

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...