Jump to content

Dave1360

TSSC Member
  • Posts

    48
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Posts posted by Dave1360

  1. Hmm, not so sure now you put it like that.  I'm sure I read that either here or on the CT forum before things there disappeared but must have been at least 4 or 5 years ago.  It kind of makes sense to me that putting water into the bottom and letting it come out at the top will ensure it's full rather than just trickling through.  And you don't really want to keep the hotter water in, you want the heat to be extracted from it, which is easier if the matrix is full.  But then that's the opposite of how the radiator works.  The workshop manuals that I've seen do all show the feed from the bottom though.  Whether that's for consistency or efficiency, I don't know.

    Don't suppose there are any thermodynamics experts around?

  2. Robin,

    As I replied on Facebook, the flow to the heater matrix should be at the bottom and the outlet from it at the top.  This will ensure the matrix is full of water and improve its efficiency although I don't know by how much in practice. 

    Cheers, Dave

  3. I didn't need a dummy layshaft when doing the 13/60 gearbox which seems to be the same as the earlier Spitfire.  I can see how it would be useful for the needle bearings on the Vitesse and later Spitfire gearboxes though.  For the additional cost of £30, a replacement layshaft seems good value as they do tend to wear over time.

    Dave

  4. I seem to remember mine taking about 5A, so I'd go along with Paul's 10A fuse suggestion.  It's probably taking its positive feed from the input to the stabiliser rather than the output, so it is "raw" battery power.

    Dave

×
×
  • Create New...