Jump to content

nicrguy1966

TSSC Member
  • Posts

    149
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by nicrguy1966

  1. I thought I was being clever not risking getting the spark plug leads mixed up, but with hindsight... I could just have labled the leads!
  2. Thanks. I'll be having another go on Monday (assuming the skin grows back on the hand I was using to pull the fan belt to turn the engine). If I understand you correctly, my tests today confirm that the cam timing is off, and finding the rocking position will tell me how much it's off. Onwards and upwards!
  3. Just to (hopefully) clarify that I'm not a total idiot, this is why I span the crankshaft to TDC after opening the gaps on rockers 1 & 2:
  4. I'm starting to think we're reaching the "too many chefs" point of the conversation. I'll take the rocket off and have another play on Monday (hopefully), but I'm just getting more confused what I'm meant to be doing. Maybe time to drive to a garage with a qualified engineer.
  5. That's the manual I was following. The quote you shared says adjust number 1 (and later number 2) rocker. But you're saying I shouldn't have adjusted rockers 1 & 2. I'm confused.
  6. Very good point about 2 TDCs. Now you've put some doubt in my mind if I did it right. If the crank was on the exhaust stroke, the exhaust valve would be wide open at TDC, and I'm pretty sure both were closed. But, before I start taking the engine apart, I'll do the check a 3rd time, maybe the way you describe this time (finding the rocking position, rather than setting to TDC). The earliest I'll have time is Monday, so another installment will follow!
  7. Ok, the latest chapter of my saga. I did the check on cam timing using the "rocker method" (as described in the workshop manual), and there might be something wrong. Assuming I did it right, after setting the gaps to 0.04" on 1 & 2, then spinning the crank around to TDC, the gaps were not the same. #1 had no gap, and #2 0.004". I did it all twice just make sure I didn't just make a mistake setting the gaps to 0.04". I've reset the gaps to 0.01" on all rockers and put the car back together as I need to use it next week. Does everyone think the timing chain cover needs to come off? Any other suggestions before I start such a major project (I assume I'll have to drain the cooling system and remove the radiator before I even start to try and remove the nut on the end of the crankshaft, and do I even have a spanner/socket that size?). Also, huge thanks to everyone that's offered suggestions so far, it's been a real boost to my confidence.
  8. Don't worry, I'm very much a "if it ain't broke, don't fix it" type owner, which is one of the reasons this problem has been ignored for so long. I'll be making damm sure the cam is in the wrong position before I start dismantling anything!
  9. That would be quite upsetting! Having a car that runs as Triumph intended is nice, but it will be incredibly annoying if after hours of work, it runs less well with the cam in the right position! (assuming it is currently in the wrong position)
  10. Longstanding, but I only recently discovered just how far from "spec" the ignition needs to be for the car to run smoothly. I really hope the cam was installed incorrectly, as I'll be expecting a big boost of power once it's fixed (and better MPG)!
  11. I spotted a red convertible Vitesse in the background of this video about electric car batteries. It appears at around 1:55 and again around 2:05.
  12. It's a long standing issue that any time anyone has ever tried to set my ignition timing correctly, the car is virtually impossible to drive, until the timing is reset 'by ear'. It's only recently I've discovered how far from spec. my timing needs to be set to actually go. I'm looking forward to checking the cam timing. I'm sort of hoping it's wrong, although that will be a fair amount of work to fix. If it isn't that I'm pretty much out of ideas!
  13. I had a reconditioned engine fitted about 15 years ago (with hardened valve seats for unleaded petrol), so there shouldn't be 50 years of wear to worry about, and those 15 years haven't been high mileage. I wonder if my timing issues originate from that engine swap? I probably drove it for several years trouble free without ever checking the ignition timing.
  14. Another project for next weekend! Even if this doesn't reveal anything wrong, it's a good excuse to check and adjust the tappets, which haven't been done for a while. As always, I'll report back once I've done the work and washed my hands!
  15. Downloaded, and I've found the section on checking the cam timing. This will be very useful in the future, not just while I'm scratching my head over timing advance. Thanks for the link.
  16. I only have the Haynes Manual, not the official Workshop Manual, and as far as I can tell, it doesn't contain anything about checking the cam timing using the "rocking valve method". Do you know if a description of this has ever been published online?
  17. It's been a problem I've been ignoring for years, but something's not right and if I can fix it, I'd like to. A problem is still a problem even if it's old. The first job is to work out why the timing is so extreme. Edit: If I fix it, I'm hoping for better performance or better MPG, or maybe both.
  18. I don't think it's a dodgy strobe as whenever anyone tries to tune the car with a strobe it ends up awful, not just me. I assume I'd have to remove the timing chain cover to check the cam timing?
  19. Update! I did a few tests this morning. 1) The timing marks seems fixed firmly to the pulley. No way I could move them in either direction, even with a screwdriver wedged into the TDC marker. 2) With the plug out of cylinder 1, I could easily feel the piston position with a screwdriver and although it doesn't move much at the top of the stroke, I could easily detect movement around 10 degrees before and after the TDC mark. So it seems the TDC mark is in the right place. 3) This time I took a photo of the strobe at idle (a smooth 650rpm). The mark is showing more than 20 degrees BTDC. 4) When rev'ed to 2000rpm, the timing mark is so far advanced, it's not visible from the angle the photo was taken at, so maybe 40 degrees BTDC! Even when set 'by ear' and running smoothly,I have noticed a lack of power at high revs and open throttle (e.g. accelerating from 50 to 70 in top gear). 5) When removing spark plug 1, I noticed the mixture was a little rich. Nothing too extreme, but worth noting. I would have expected a lean mixture given the K&N air filters. So that's all the latest news. Any idea what to try next?
  20. That makes a lot more sense than my idea! Hopefully it will not come to that. First I need to inspect the pulley, then try setting the crankshaft to TDC then see what the timing indicator position is. After that, maybe I'll think about removing the pulley, but it's something I'd prefer to avoid, especially as the car is currently drivable with its weird timing advance setting.
  21. I dread to think how much it would cost to post a GT6, even second class
  22. If you're in NW England you probably don't need to share it with me either as I'm in SE England! Thanks for the offer anyway!
  23. The strobe is triggered by the spark to plug 1, so I'm not sure what difference that would make, apart from the position of the distributor, but I'm open to suggestions.
  24. John, I forgot to ask, when you say "send it to me", just out of curiosity, where are you?
×
×
  • Create New...