micmak Posted December 1, 2023 Report Share Posted December 1, 2023 I have noticed that most Vitesses and Heralds have very positive camber on the rear wheels. However, I think my Vitesse is exceptional positive. It really looks weird that the tops of the wheels are so far out compared to the bottom. And I noticed that it is worse if I have reversed the car, and stopped. If I go forward a foot or so, it seems to be ever so slightly closer to zero, but only a tiny bit. I understand that part of the restoration of this car included a new rear spring. When I bought the car, the seller said that the positive camber was because of the new spring and it would settle in time. Not sure if I believe him. If I were to drive the car as a daily car to and from work, in traffic, and on the main roads, it might settle after a few years. But as a toy car that will only come out a half dozen times a year, I can’t see it settling anytime soon. Is there any adjustment I can make, or should I just ignore it? .....Mick..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Lewis Posted December 1, 2023 Report Share Posted December 1, 2023 (edited) as this camber changes when you drive its down to incorrect rear wheel Toe have a read of this link there are cheap tools about to make it easy but you can do a lot with simple diy you dont need lasers or 4 wheel alignment +costs to correct your problem if you want to reduce the neg camber then fit a lowering block between spring and diff available from manyAlloy Diff Spacers : Canley Classics the wsm data for Vitesse does state 150lbs on EACH seat to set the static ride height so get rent a crowd round or a project needing a few bags of sand . doing it unladen will not get the correct result Edited December 1, 2023 by Pete Lewis Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
dannyb Posted December 1, 2023 Report Share Posted December 1, 2023 (edited) You can add a lowering block between spring and diff. Danny Looks like Pete beat me. Edited December 1, 2023 by dannyb Error Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Qu1ckn1ck Posted December 1, 2023 Report Share Posted December 1, 2023 As suggested by Pete, a lowering block solved a similar problem with a new spring on my GT6. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Lewis Posted December 1, 2023 Report Share Posted December 1, 2023 Danny and me playing at Snap !!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micmak Posted December 1, 2023 Author Report Share Posted December 1, 2023 3 hours ago, Pete Lewis said: as this camber changes when you drive its down to incorrect rear wheel Toe have a read of this link there are cheap tools about to make it easy but you can do a lot with simple diy you dont need lasers or 4 wheel alignment +costs to correct your problem if you want to reduce the neg camber then fit a lowering block between spring and diff available from manyAlloy Diff Spacers : Canley Classics the wsm data for Vitesse does state 150lbs on EACH seat to set the static ride height so get rent a crowd round or a project needing a few bags of sand . doing it unladen will not get the correct result OK, I just need to understand this a bit more. Pete, are you saying that the positive camber is caused by incorrect toe? How can the incorrect direction (straight or un-straight) of a wheel impact its camber (tilted in or out)? And further still, how can a lowering block between the diff and the spring correct it? I can see that some sort of lowering block might correct the camber, but surely that has nothing to do with the toe? And are you telling me that I need to get a bunch of beefy people into my little car before deciding if I have a problem or not??😄 By the way, this is not going to be a tomorrow or the next day kind of issue. Once I have the car running properly and no longer dumping fuel, I hope to then adjust the body panels to allow the doors to close properly. THEN, rear wheel camber will be my next challenge - probably not before next Summer. .....Mick..... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Lewis Posted December 2, 2023 Report Share Posted December 2, 2023 if the rear toe is not around zero then as you move the /\ of the tyres/wheels will either try to converge or separate hence why the camber climbs or reduces depending on toe in/toe out /backwards/forwards its a common problem with a swing axle arrangement less obvious with a double wishbone . the idea of loading is to get the suspension in its average road running height unladen will give you a error unless the data specifically says unladen . a lowering block will give you a better appearance and less \-/ camber it has no effect on toe but any change in suspension needs the toe resetting as a matter of coarse.as one change willl affect all the other setting . so you need to do both add a block and measure the toe , two bits of timber and a tape measure + a spare pair of hands Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
micmak Posted December 2, 2023 Author Report Share Posted December 2, 2023 8 hours ago, Pete Lewis said: if the rear toe is not around zero then as you move the /\ of the tyres/wheels will either try to converge or separate hence why the camber climbs or reduces depending on toe in/toe out /backwards/forwards its a common problem with a swing axle arrangement less obvious with a double wishbone . the idea of loading is to get the suspension in its average road running height unladen will give you a error unless the data specifically says unladen . a lowering block will give you a better appearance and less \-/ camber it has no effect on toe but any change in suspension needs the toe resetting as a matter of coarse.as one change willl affect all the other setting . so you need to do both add a block and measure the toe , two bits of timber and a tape measure + a spare pair of hands Pete, initially, this seems very complicated. But when you take a moment and really study it, it more or less makes sense. I am no mathematician, surveyor or geometrist (is that even a word???), but what you are saying makes a certain amount of sense to me. I will put it on the back burner for now. I have more pressing issues like the proper running of the car and then the panel alignment. But I look forward to trying to address this issue over the next couple of seasons (probably in the Summer). I think it is a manual thing that needs no specific instruments or machinery. I’m sure they didn’t have such instruments back when these little cars were built. I like to consider myself to have reasonable intelligence, so it can't be TOO difficult. I will consult you and the other Gentlemen when I am at a point where I am ready to make these adjustments. Thank you, Pete. …..Mick….. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now