Jump to content

Gully

TSSC Member
  • Posts

    1,307
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Posts posted by Gully

  1. 1 hour ago, Aidsaunders said:

    There’s a cap on the original setup that resists rotation, it’s fitted before the split pin. Also, the setup is torqued up so there’s no end float. Any expansion has nowhere to go. 

    There's a flat washer with a D shaped hole which sits between the castellated nut and the bearing. It locates on the flat on the threaded section to remove any rotational force on the nut itself. The nut is not torqued to prevent it moving - it's tightened, then backed off, with the split pin then preventing it moving from the set position.

    When my GT6 was MOT'd last year, the chap who does it had an apprentice with him and he was explaining to him the need for movement on the taper bearings.

    Gully

  2. 18 hours ago, Pete Lewis said:

    Paul next time you are round here  lets run her over the tracking gear 

    going light is more down to the lift from the lack of down force upsetting the static toe in 

    back to checking with 150 lb on each seat ( or just we use rent a crowd  

    i could take the kit to the Pub on monday  ????

    Pete

    Hi Pete,

    Unless my two trusty pieces of timber (loose copies of your patented design!) are out of calibration, it's all set to the book. It's not skittish, just lighter, and no general directional stability issues. Given the time of year, I suspect we'd be in the dark in the car park on Monday, but worth a 2nd pair of eyes next time I'm over with you in the daylight!

    Many thanks,

    Paul

  3. 2 hours ago, Iain T said:

    Isn't it really the oil spilling over the sliding joint between the air piston and cap. I agree best to check regularly to dampen the rise in the piston or the mixture will go lean on acceleration. 

    Iain 

    As Doug noted below, the top adjuster CDSEs have O-rings by the needle adjusters immersed in the damper oil, which deteriorate and leak.

    Gully

  4. 1 hour ago, dougbgt6 said:

    I have CDSE top adjusters which do have "O" rings. A pain to replace. There's a tiny sprag washer that has to be banged out from the needle end. Best to do it in a plastic bag as the sprag can travel a LONG way, generally never to be seen again.

    Doug

    Likewise!

    Gully

  5. 6 minutes ago, Pete Lewis said:

    myself i am not a fan of cars that dont seem to have turned a wheel but..... driven by the voting  it got a shield I would have liked to know where/how  the car was re built 

    it was just tooooo   clean 

    Pete

    From what I could glean, it's just come out of an 8 year rebuild - much of it by the owner, but painted professionally.

    Gully

    • Like 1
  6. 1 hour ago, Pete Lewis said:

    yes they have performed very well  and whilst is was moby dick i had the guardian turned off  and oddly i get no scam calls now 

    guess the bummers have taken me off their call listing  but thanks to Good Olde Doug it solved the scam call problem   seemingly for good 

    and yes im writing this s l o w l y    

    Pete

    I tried to get our locals to call you and ask for dashpot oil advice to aid your recovery, but clearly nobody got through! 🤣

    Gully

  7. On 18/08/2023 at 17:05, johny said:

    I always thought that must be a mistake (not unheard of in the manual) because surely the engine is heavier than the backend so more pressure will always be need at the front to keep the correct tyre shape and contact area....

    I always assumed it was a RWD thing. RWD Escorts also had higher rear pressures than fronts. My experience with my '71 GT6 is if the fronts are pumped too hard, understeer appears - inevitable with the boat anchor of an engine mounted partially in front of the (virtual) front axle - and if the rears are too soft I can feel the sidewalls 'slopping'. Given that the GT6 Mk3 handbook was updated for the late swing spring models (so it covers both suspension designs), I don't believe the earlier pressures were a mistake.

    Michelin's period fitment guide for the TR6 was 22psi front and 26psi rear...

    Gully

  8. There are various threads on here regarding tyre pressures. Triumph had the GT6 MkIII pre-1973 cars with the fronts at a lower pressure than the rear, but reversed that for the 1973 swing spring cars. From the owners manual (based on 155 SR-13 radials):

    Pre-'73 Front: 24psi, Rear 28psi

    1973 Front: 30psi, Rear 26psi 

    Gully

  9. My GT6 Mk 3 is set at around 10 degrees advance - I've tweaked it by about a degree in 10 years of ownership! Tickover is set slightly higher than the manual at c. 1000rpm, as it's always had a tendency to occasionally die at junctions when down at c. 850. Pulls fine across the rev range. I use Super Unleaded, generally with a fuel additive (which includes octane boost as well as lead substitute and anti-ethanol properties).

    As many have outlined above - if it runs well when set 'by feel / ear', there can't be too much wrong; seems to point to the damper ring having slipped as per John D's research.

    Gully 

  10. Whenever I follow one of these auction links I get drawn into browsing the other Lots available. There's a lovely Nova GTE in the sale - I had the 1.4i version back in the early 1990's and loved it: so much better than the Corsa which followed. Always had a soft spot for Vauxhalls, with my first car having been a Mk 1 Astra.

    Gully

  11. On 16/07/2023 at 17:20, daverclasper said:

    Do you know who supplied it please gully. Same issue on mine (though Vitesse). Currently using a rubber washer and about a 5mm thick washer to reduce the depth.

    Maybe not sealing where it should, as have empty section/sections of overflow hose always.

    No problems with overheating, even when really hot ambient temp and traffic jams, so not the end of the world I guess?

    Thanks, Dave

    Mine came from Car Builder Solutions: https://www.carbuilder.com/uk/radiator-caps

    Gully

  12. 57 minutes ago, Kevin Atkins said:

    It is, really strange - like you say, max pressure should be around 13 psi, unless that expansion hose is at fault like you suggest - that scenario makes sense, so definitely going to check that when the car has cooled down..

    Worth checking that your rad cap isn't too deep for the neck of the radiator. If the sprung seal is completely compressed, it can't lift to release the pressure. Mind you, it's unlikely - main issue I had was finding a cap deep enough!

    Gully

  13. My GT6 runs 175/70 tyres on 5 inch rims all round and has no bulkhead clearance issues. Standard front springs and shocks. When QuickNick and I compared cars (when he was having his bulkhead fouling issues) we found the front of his car (ground / chassis clearance) was sitting slightly lower than mine - as he's indicated above, a slight front end lift via adjustable spring pan shocks solved the problem.

    Gully

×
×
  • Create New...