Jump to content

Mad4classics

TSSC Member
  • Posts

    207
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    3

Posts posted by Mad4classics

  1. 9 hours ago, Peter Truman said:

    where do you get these little seal washers that go on the gauge male union from, I've had to make them for years by turning down reasonably thick fiber washers it's not overly successful & I'm, not happy in using an O ring as the appear too soft.

    Can you advise the supplier please

    Traditionally the gauge oil seal itself was leather and seals well. Searching for part number 2K4936 throws up quite a few suppliers.

    David

    e.g. https://www.trgb.co.uk/collections/wheels-and-body-fittings/products/leather-washer-for-oil-feed-pipe

    • Like 1
  2. 4 hours ago, trigolf said:

    2.Also the original rubber hoses for the front used to be supplied with the outer anti-chafe spring. But browsing the net, I can't see any that do now.

    Quinton Hazel brake hoses are still supplied with the anti-chaff spring if originally fitted. Bought some recently when I needed new hoses because I had one black plastic spring and one metal. 

    David

     

    screenshot20200719_174834994.png

    • Like 1
  3. 1 hour ago, Colin Lindsay said:

    Triumph factory records are largely complete - on your BMIHT Certificate you'll see them all even down to the key numbers, tyres and wheel size; certainly mine has a lot of info for GT6, Herald and even the TR7. My Herald has the diff and gearbox numbers recorded too.

    DVA doesn't really use anything other than commission and registration numbers but if you look at the V5 you'll see many of them there too, engine number etc.

    It's usually the chassis number that's not recorded, as it was for use only by the factory.

     

    For my car I've got commission number, engine number (still has that) and body number; factory fitted equipment was heater and Dunlop C41 tyres. There's no record of key numbers, gearbox or back axle numbers.

    David

    ps. Just fished out my copy of Spitfire ang GT6 A Guide to Originallity; I notice on page 109 there's a comment about the MK1 GT6 commision plate being so large it covered the body number plate. MK3 plate is much smaller.

  4. The heritage certificate I obtained for my car lists the number on the small plate as 4) body number.

    Saying that I expect factory records are not totally complete.

    I believe that on some models the commision plate was so large that it did cover the body number, why didn't the factory drill the plate holes more central?

    David

  5. OK; slightly outside the box. I've experienced this on a new competition Mini engine which sat on the bench for months after the brand new oil pump was primed. Much churning on the starter and no oil pressure - sweaty moment.

    In the end decided to back fill the pump as @poppyman suggested and hey presto oil pressure - big sigh of relief all round.

    I would inject as much oil in the outer ring as you can, wait a moment fill it some more and then spin it over on the starter (plugs out).

    David

  6. On 25/06/2020 at 23:42, Peter Truman said:

    I was intrigued when someone quoted that the female or boss welded into the sump was a parallel NPT thread, as when I ran the 3/8in NPT tapered tap through it penetrated the boss easily for a good distance.

    So on a cold 5C morning here in Melbourne I went into the garage in my jarmies to measure the spare GT6 sump I have, wouldn't dare bring it into the warm house. The welded in boss for the sump plug is 11.5mm long, the inside the sump boss ID is 14.78mm, and the external sump boss ID 15.08mm, appears to be a 0.3mm taper in 11.5mm? Two of the 3 spare tapered 3/8in NPT threaded sump plugs I have measured 16.2mm at its end (14.8mm thread root) and 17.2mm (15.9mm thread root) at the top over the threads, over length of 13.3mm, the third plug was slightly smaller dia's but same taper. So the plug has a taper of 1mm in 13mm length, whereas the female boss 0.3mm in 11.5mm.  

    In the finality I don't think I proved anything, except I got cold!

    Is the sump boss tapered or not or is the dia change due to years or screwing the tapered plug into and enlarging the boss ID?

    Peter T

     Gallant job on a cold winters morning I must say.

    I'm still scratching my head over your figures. NPT taper is 1inch change in diameter or every 16inches of thread length for all thread sizes; which as it's a simple ratio can be expressed as 1mm in 16mm.

    So to my way of thinking:-

    For a plug length of 13mm the change in diameter from start to finish should be 1/16 x 13 = 0.8125mm

    For a boss depth of 11.5 the change in diameter from start to finish should be 1/16 x 11.5 = 0.71875mm

    Seems strange to me that a sump thread would be parallel as the sealing would only be on the very first thread of the boss, unless the idea was that the boss being mild steel would distort in preference to the case iron plug - odd. Something "below the water line" (you know what I mean) surely needs a half decent seal?

    (Random thought: is it an easier manufacturing method to use a parallel first tap and follow it up with the taper finishing tap but not all the way through - just enough to provide a seal, thus distorting the measured figures. It's the sort of thing I'd do to cut a taper fitting - hard work with just a finishing tap)?

    David

    PS. Have a soft spot for the other end of the world (reference to the book by R.K.Dean); when a whippersnapper my family emigrated to NZ for a time; still have my crossing the line certificate.

    Screenshot from 2020-06-26 10-55-51.png

  7. On 24/06/2020 at 09:26, Colin Lindsay said:

    That's the way I always took it to be, the hole is just a straight-through tapped drilling - try it with a normal bolt which you'll know isn't tapered - and the plugs are tapered. Sump, gearbox and diff are all straight-through. 

    OK, @Pete Lewisand @Colin LindsayI'm trying to get to a fifth page.

    Unsurprising  I haven't got a 3/8 NPS bolt; so thinking about your comment I made up a GO NOGO gauge for the internal IDs' of NPT and NPS because curiosity got the better of me.

    I've got an FD axle with no drain plug and measuring the casing threads in that it's definitely straight i.e. NPS.

    Now, I've got a really odd early alloy gearbox with Spitfire ratios fitted (some PO might have had aspirations to racing?); measured the casing threads on that and it's definitely tapered i.e NPT. Even to the naked eye you can see it's tapered!

    I didn't want to test the engine sump drain plug as I've only recently changed the oil; but I suspect it will turn out straight perhaps when I get a chance to measure it.

    So I've got a mix of straight and taper casing threads but the same plug fits all of them!!!!

    This then goes back to my comment about bean counters; did Triumph start using the straight thread a) With the cast iron casings? b) When the diff drain plug was dropped as an additional cost saving? ( I haven't got an early one to measure) c) Is the gearbox always different anyway????! (I haven't got a later one to measure.)

    The other thing I found was that the one original plug I've got is 3/8" square whereas all the replacements I've bought because they'd been badly mangled are 7/16 square. do'oh!

    I remember coming across a thread on another triumph site where an owner had fitted a straight plug in a taper alloy casing hole and stripped the thread by over-tightening it. The fit of straight plug in a taper casing is all wrong!

    The bottom line is I think you need to know exactly what you've got before you depart from the taper plug Triumph specified.

    But if you're after something different, a search for 3/8NPT plugs in general threw up Advanced Fluid Solutions they've got all sorts and they have an eBay outlet.

    https://www.advancedfluidsolutions.co.uk/solid-hex-or-allen-key-male-blanking-plugs-481-c.asp

     

    So rather than completely answering this I've thrown up more questions. Going for that fifth page!

    David

     

    image20200625_120213796.jpg

  8. 12 hours ago, Pete Lewis said:

    i did say straight threads , most of the aftermarket hex heads seem to be straight not a NPT or anything like it 

    pete

     

    OK, sorry - with you now.

    Your quite right there's a right mix of plugs being sold, some don't fit.

    The female filler and drain threads I've got are all appear tapered; could be deformation caused by years of taper plug fitting maybe? - but I would hope not. The ASME standard recommends both sides taper. Or is this another case of Triumph bean counters?

    Putting a straight plug with a sealing washer in a tapered hole results in the thread fit changing progressivly along the engagement length.

    David

  9. 2 hours ago, Peter Truman said:

    In the depths of my mind I remember a recommendation when servicing the rack to use diff hypoid oil at the regular servicing ie 6 pumps thro the grease nipple reason the old grease in the rack can go hard and stop lubricant pushing along the rack tube.

    don’t know where I got the idea from, but I’ve done it that way 30 years when I’ve undone the rack boot on the near side oil has been there!

     

    Grease in the steering rack seems to be a Triumph thing, don't know why ???.

    Mini, MG etc lubrication for the steering rack states fill with 1/3 pint SAE 90 oil, the top up usually being by releasing the gaitor clip and injecting there (no grease nipple). Equally messy job and difficult to gauge 1/3 pint content when you've got a leak!

    David

  10. 1 hour ago, Pete Lewis said:

    the threads wont seal by themselves 

    Pete

    NPT threads (both male and female being NPT) are classed self sealing but are not pressure rated without sealing in some way, therefore ok for sump plugs and the like.

    Some classes of NPTF (F for Fuel) are completly self sealing because they form a complete interference fit and therefore do not need any sealant.

    David

  11. Paul,

    Is the thread straight NPS (non self sealing) or taper NPT (self sealing)? 

    Got my last lot of plugs from ANG Classic Car Parts plus a few spare and the fit a treat; but I notice their website picture of the plug has changed so presumably a new supplier? Hope they fit as well as before.

    Taper threads do not need to be gorilla tight to seal.

    David

     

    image20200623_152856402.jpg

  12. 18 hours ago, Paulfc said:

    Thanks Paul,

    As I understand it, if the plug has a washer it won’t be NPT. A tapered thread would not require one.

    Paul

    I'm also puzzled by Canleys' offering; there's no picture on their web site to show what it's about.

    Taper threads seal by an interference fit which is achieved just beyond the "finger tight" point along the whole length of thread engagement. (This is why a BSP plug in NPT doesn't seal properly because the threads bind at certain point along the engagement length therefore not forming a proper interference fit seal.)

    Straight threads do need a sealing washer - mixing straight and taper threads is unusual!

    David

    Screenshot from 2020-06-23 14-57-33.png

  13. It's just a case of removing your existing filter and the 5/8 male-male adapter currently fitted unless you've got a real original style filter as per the photo of one for a Spitfire which incorporated a male 5/8 thread instead of the female thread and didn't require the adapter.

    Any existing adapter should be just finger tight.

    I'm sure someone will tell you to screw the adaptor into the block but these wix24037 adaptors were originally supplied with the oil filter eg 51312 for Spitfire in the link below. The intension was to screw the adaptor into the filter with a large flat bladed screw driver to replicate the original filter fitment.

    I'm with @yorkshire_ spam I fit 713/9 to Spitfire.

    David

    https://m.wixfilters.com/Search/PartDetail?PartID=25605 &Source=ASR

     

     

    s-l400.jpg

    • Like 1
  14. 34 minutes ago, mpbarrett said:

    The 'electrician' was thrown off the site and main contractor had to get there electrical contractor to redo ALL the crimped connections on the facility. It cost thousands of pounds and weeks of work to redo all the connections.
    Therefore, if you don't have the correct crimping tool don't try to use crimped connections!

    An electrical panel shouldn't be certified without having the correct crimps.To operate a correctly calibrated ratchet crimp tool for those you need to have had a good hearty breakfast in the morning and a couple of sausage rolls on standby to keep you going!

    23 minutes ago, classiclife said:

    Give me the good old Lucas connectors any day and of course keeps the period look.

    Got to agree with you there Richard, but if you're using the crimp version you still need to use the proper crimp tool for them.

    David

  15. 16 hours ago, NonMember said:

    Not true of rear lights on roundtail Spitfire and GT6. Or the front indicators on Mk1/2 Spitfire / Mk1 GT6. They all used the style Colin posted.

    +1

    Absolutaly, all the rear lights on my car use that style. The later crimped bullets are to small to fit

    If you manage to find a genuine NOS Lucas light fitting (period red/black or red box, not the later green ones) there's often a set of hollow bullets wrapped up in the box.

    David

  16. 18 minutes ago, rulloyd said:

    Hmm.  Yes, all th modern connectors seem to be a different diameter to the original (4.6mm).  The type of bullet you show is avalable at 4.7mm diameter (from AES anway).  The crimped connector in the picture i posted is only 3.9mm.

    I think the one you posted is called a japanese bullet; there are many different styles and critically sizes!!!

    And I've seen many unfortunate wiring incidents where someone has tried to fit the wrong one and used pliers to squash the mating half down to make it fit.

     

    David

    image20200603_154014771.jpg

×
×
  • Create New...