Jump to content

Cam follower question


Waynebaby

Recommended Posts

Hi All,

 

I've attached a picture of one of the cam-followers from my Mk3 GT6. As you can see, there is a small chip on what is an otherwise unblemished follower. The rest of the folIowers and the camshaft are in good condition. This is possibly a daft question, but should I change the damaged follower or is the chip in a region of the follower which the cam lobe does not bear upon?  I know that a new follower is relatively cheap, but I'm not keen on inflicting on my engine the "running in" procedure for a new follower (thrash the engine at 2500+ rpm for the first 20 minutes post rebuild to let the cam-lube work it's magic) unless I have to.

 

Wayne

 

post-995-0-42576500-1456922570_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I would ask myself how has this happened? Has something wacked it? Has that weakened it?

 

Or Is it made from a dodgy piece of metal in the first place? Is it going to loose more chunks in a spectacular fashion?

 

I'd change it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The cam manufacturers (e.g. Piper) give instructions for the first start-up which include dire warnings about not letting the engine idle at all for at least the first 20 minutes. It might be voodoo engineering, but supposedly the combination of heat, pressure and the high zinc content of the cam-lube has a beneficial effect on the surface finish of the cam-lobe and cam-follower thus maximising longevity. From what I've read, the reason for avoiding tick over during this period is because the cam to follower loading is higher at lower revs and you need to avoid the possibility of breaking down the oil film at this critical period. 

 

Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

John,

 

Thanks for your advice, but a new follower and a new push rod to go with it are already winging their way from Rimmers. I won't need to fit it for a while though as I'm awaiting the return of my damaged cylinder head, which gives me the time to mull over the two options.

 

Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Having suffered the results of soft cam followers I would urge you to take John's sound advice. Stick with what you've got. Damage to my engine included the loss of three lobes from the camshaft the swarf from which destroyed the oil pump. There are a lot of iffy cam followers out there so beware!.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I wonder what triumph did on production build test beds, anyone found the process sheets for production engines

 

Ive said before many manufacturese in the day ran them on town gas and often engines back to back so the running turned the other

 

i doubt they would have 'run in'  cam followers

 

 one things certain its best to never mix new followers old cam or old followers new cam  a worn follower with a slight concave base will soon pluck the edge off your

 new cams.

 

going back to the years of being was it poor or tight?  i had a well run Ryton built   78 Talbot  Alpine with the 1442 cc a  really bag of spanners valve train, 

I won a cam form the factory but could not afford the followers, so into a pillar drill on some fine wet dry and refaced them  on a hard block, ,  this took a lot off and the tappet screws only just long enough, but despite all it was sold , really nice and quite...it remained  quiet  like that for over 100,000 miles till scrapped 

 

not something i would advise but when you had to get out and get under or starve its surprising what will work well 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pete,

 

Your observation of the inadvisability of mixing new and old components has helped to convince me that I should stick with the original cam-follower, although I imagine that an old cam with a new follower is less likely to cause problems than visa versa.

 

Cheers

 

Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

both can be a well founded waste of money, the followers are slightly offset to the centre line of the lobe so it makes the follower rotate as its lifted, many when new have a very shallow convex surface, when they wear they start to pluck metal off the leading edge of the lobe, so this starts to take on the shape of the worn follower , and they become a sort of matched pair

 

put a nice new follower on a cam thats now not entirely 'flat' and the old cam minces the new follower

 

so really its stick with what you have or change the lot .....again you pays your money and makes the choice

 

compromise can work ..got that Tee shirt , but utopia is the way to happy motoring. with deep pockets , its all a preference

theres no point in spending £££££s and only doing 500 miles a year

 

some guys spend a fortune and never use it , whilst others spend as little as possible a drive many thousands on miles

so like to poodle around others thrash the nuts off it .

 

there's a happy in between .....somewhere

 

 

Pete

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

A concave surface, Pete?

 

I used to believe that a new follower would be slightly convex, you mention concave, but I learnt recently that OE Triumph followers are/were flat when new.

 

Do you know what they should be?

 

John

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I'd post some pictures of the new cam-follower (which I've decided not to use) compared to the original. The new follower is, as you'd expect, dimensionally identical to the original but the construction seems different. The business end of the original has a 4mm region which seems to be made of different darker material whereas the new follower is the same colour all over. Do you think the OEM follower is really fabricated from two separate sections or might the darkening be a phosphate coating?

 

Wayne 

 

 

post-995-0-52382700-1457098850_thumb.jpg

post-995-0-55975100-1457098884_thumb.jpg

post-995-0-51271400-1457098916_thumb.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I thought I'd post some pictures of the new cam-follower (which I've decided not to use) compared to the original. The new follower is, as you'd expect, dimensionally identical to the original but the construction seems different. The business end of the original has a 4mm region which seems to be made of different darker material whereas the new follower is the same colour all over. Do you think the OEM follower is really fabricated from two separate sections or might the darkening be a phosphate coating?

 

Wayne 

 

 

Case hardening?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I suppose it could be nitriding or something similar John. I also noticed that the new follower has a very small chamfer machined into the tappet face, so I wasn't being accurate when I said it was dimensionally identical to the original. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Ah. Of course - it's obvious now you've pointed it out. The dark portion is the part of the tappet that doesn't run in the cam-follower bore. It was the precise delineation of the colour change which fooled me into thinking it was an engineered feature.

 

Wayne

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...