Jump to content

Vitesse 2L Mk1 misfire on cold start, now blown head gasket.


68vitesse

Recommended Posts

My Vitesse misfires on first start of the day which then clears and car fine for rest of the day, no coolant loss and low oil consumption. Today I removed the plugs when cold, NGK BP6ES, to find numbers 4 and 5 difficult to remove all plug electrode's look ok but number 4 plug is eroded or corroded at start of thread near electrode number 5 not so bad. Just changed these two plugs for a couple of new champion plugs and car started without a problem and ran fine while I did my food shopping. 

Don't know if this is a permanent fix and wondering if these are fake plugs, never had a problem with NGK before.

Regards

Paul

Edited by 68vitesse
Update
Link to comment
Share on other sites

can't comment on the corrosion issue but around 8 years ago I brought 24 new NGK BP6ES plugs as a job lot at a club meeting over the following 8 years there've all failed ie the Pete Lewis advised saturation of the non glazed insulator, I put the last 2 in a couple of weeks ago. Maybe they were cheap for a reason!

The issue is how I start the car so as to get oil circulation before firing the engine after she's stood unused for a while, choke in spin the starter for 8-10sec then pull the choke and churn for another couple of secs then she fires, she is obviously flooded a little as she runs rough then clears.

With an unglazed plug insulator it gets saturated and fails, there very hard to dry out and clean sometimes its fixed the issue for a short period but once there've been saturated their life expectancy appears short, Being honest because I had a good supply I just replaced them.

I'm now looking for Bosch replacements, but for some reason there getting hard to source here locally in Melbourne almost as if Bosch are limiting there supply! NGK virtually have the market covered esp with the major aftermarket suppliers.

Ridiculous as it sounds I'm looking to source plugs from the UK, and pay the shipping 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

All this has made me think that my policy of keeping the same plugs (so long I cant remember when but certainly 25+ years) has been a good idea. Admittedly over that time Ive only averaged about 1000 miles a year but I just clean/gap them and back in they go - after all we're talking a tractor engine here not F1....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, johny said:

tractor engine here not F1....

its all down to modern  fuel injection runs without any major enrichment like you get withma choke /carb system that plug design parameters have changed to suit present running conditions 

it doenst say when these changes came about but certainly many members have found early life plug break downs on certain plug makes 

lots of short cold runs will not help ,    plenty of good hot running obviously should help 

pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

change the engine oil on a modern at 5000miles   HMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMMmmmmm!!!!

petrol detergents are not letting the valves to be cleaned  with direct injection HMMMmmmmm  !!!!

some of this is designed to put the fear of deep pockets into practice and collect the proceeds 

I might e a bit old but much of that should remain with the shoe repairer 

Pete

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hang on... the petrol being sprayed directly into the cylinder means that it can't clean the carbon off the back of the valves... which got there from the fuel that... isn't being sprayed on the valves in the first place.

As Pete rightly says, it's a consignment of geriatric shoemakers.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, NonMember said:

which got there from the fuel that... isn't being sprayed on the valves in the first place.

Which got there from the EGR and breather systems.... and ran down the valve stem from leaky valve stem seals....... before being baked on.

Valve backs noticeably cleaner on engines with port FI rather than carb.  Never owned a DI petrol and not planning to. 

DI diesels can have ports almost blocked by carbon deposits from EGR.......

P1160903s.jpg.c79b06e1f18f57a23ede145071a7c427.jpg

P1160907es.jpg.5e3a2bc51d1dede07c72be6e7d696b47.jpg

I doubt DI petrol get quite this bad, but even a 1/4 as bad.......!!

BTW pics are of a VAG 1.7SDI inlet.  It ran better when cleaned out. 

Got to agree on those pesky designers though.  Lots clear advances in maintenance hostility in recent years, especially in the VAG stables.

 

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Nick Jones said:

Valve backs noticeably cleaner on engines with port FI rather than carb. 

Yes, because the vast majority of the crap on the backs of valves comes from over-fuelling, which carbs do lots and FI doesn't. Most GDI engines don't need EGR.

The level of carbon you're seeing on that diesel engine is because it's been badly maintained and driven by a thug - it's been over-fuelled and smoky for quite some time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 08/01/2021 at 17:27, NonMember said:

been badly maintained and driven by a thug - it's been over-fuelled and smoky for quite some time.

Quite possibly, came to us with 140k (and nearly solid oil). This at about 175k. 

Never smoked. Even when driven at continuously at full throttle, which is the only way anything “powered” by a VAG SDI engine will actually move (the s is for slow). Didn’t use any oil either.

Did a similar exercise on my 5 pot Audi TDI when it had done about 175k. It was nearly as bad in spite of meticulous maintenance. EGR was disabled at the same time. Now on 335k and still clean so I conclude that EGR is the cause. It’s always comfortably passed the MoT emissions first run since then too, whereas before it needed all 6 attempts to squeak through.....

Nick

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's a valve system that rechannels part of the exhaust gases back through the engine to burn any unused fuel that might otherwise come out through the exhaust and increase emissions. Fine in theory; in reality it just soots everything up and causes problems including eventual loss of power. I removed mine from the TD5 Discovery; very easy to do in most cars as you just remove the actual valve then blank off both ends of the pipe it sits in (some have a water pipe for cooling that you just reconnect end to end). It doesn't affect the MOT as diesel cars aren't tested for emissions (over here anyway, when they're actually being tested at all, that is)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thank you gentlemen. Je vais dormir moins bête, as the saying goes.

Isn't one of the main points objectives of electronic fuel injection to stop there being too much fuel going in.

I really should stick to simple things, low/ no tech . .so where is my dot to dot book?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Colin Lindsay said:

rechannels part of the exhaust gases back through the engine to burn any unused fuel

Actually it has nothing to do with burning unburnt fuel. Its purpose differs almost entirely between diesel and petrol, even though the mechanism is very similar.

On a diesel engine, the EGR serves to slow the burn of the injected fuel, particularly at high boost, which reduces the temperature and hence reduces NOx emissions. However, the consequence of lower temperatures is also that you run less efficiently and produce more black smoke. As a side note, the famous VW emissions scandal centred around them actually using less EGR in the real world, and hence getting more NOx (but also more fuel economy) than the test implied.

On a petrol engine, EGR is used to increase cylinder pressure when running at very light load. The air/fuel mix must be stoichiometric so you can't add extra air, which means you run into both "pumping losses" and combustion (pressure) limits. Adding some inert (exhaust) gas allows you to get round both of these and run more efficiently, giving better economy and emissions.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hello Paul,

NGK is a decent plug and TBH you will always get a duff plug at some stage - either on initial installation or after some use. Purchasing from reputable companies such as Green Spark Company is at least a step forward in the right direction to ensure a quality product. 

I've used and still use NGK BP6ES on all my past & present classics without issue; I'm sure my day will come !!

I know Nick recommends Bosch WR78 which are multi pronged. Of note and IIRC the WR78X has a wider electrode gap and is probably unsuitable for cars that use BP6ES whereas the WR78 is suitable - I'm sure Nick can confirm that either way.

Champion do have a somewhat chequered history with many users reporting that their performance is inconsistent. I cannot really quote on that as I have not used Champion plugs since the mid-80's.

It's easy to be sweeping and chuck the baby out with the bathwater.

I always give the threads of my plugs the minutest smear of oil to prevent the plugs binding - never had any running issues doing that and nor when removing them.

Regards.

Richard.     

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...