Sidd Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 I have gearboxes with the following prefixes: DC, LG, CB, WE which don't match any of the listings I can find. What models are they from?Whitley (on hill above coastal village).pdf Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PeteH Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 I can tell you the CB is a Herald box. Mine is CB22**** in 1971 reg 13/60 Convertible. Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johny Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 Ive got a WE unit and I think its was decided to be from an Dolomite 1850 but a very early type same as Vitesse/GT6 HC or KC units with small main shaft tip and small synchro rings. Its input shaft should stick out further than the other gearboxes you have.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thescrapman Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 Photos from further back may help, or list input shaft type and length, and size of output flange. CB is possibly a badly stamped GB. I think thr LG is DG Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Lindsay Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 CB and WE are the easier ones, but did the TR series use the same gearbox casing for the earlier models? Their prefixes are CT, LE and LF, so possibly LG could be a variant? CC and CD boxes were used in the heavier TRs like the TR6, so might be an option for DC? I've found nothing closer to LG or DC so far. Similarly I was trying to check MG gearbox numbers or Standard models but nothing yet. I've seen more than one CB box (might actually have one) and will post a photo if I can find it; it doesn't look like a bad stamping if I remember correctly. DG is another Dolomite box. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
thescrapman Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 I reckoned n the DC is also DG, but the lazy guy on the gearbox line couldn't be arsed to look for the G stamp, and C is close enough. Or the G was worn out so he used C perhaps? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
NonMember Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 49 minutes ago, Colin Lindsay said: did the TR series use the same gearbox casing No. I think all the TRs from 2 to 6 used the saloon type gearbox. Similarly, the only MG / Morris application of a Triumph box was the single rail type, so that's not it either. I agree with scrapman that the LG is probably a badly stamped DG. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johny Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 That fits in with the quality of stamping you sometimes see! Perhaps thats being unfair though, maybe they only had 30 seconds to do it before the box was whisked off on the production line and, if not, a car would be delivered somewhere without a gearbox😁 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Lindsay Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 Photos of my CB box, just for info: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanMi Posted November 6, 2021 Report Share Posted November 6, 2021 the number really doesn't mean that much anymore, the case could have any gearset in after 50 years plus of recons and they may well have been re-stamped. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nick Jones Posted November 8, 2021 Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 ^^^what Dan says…… Nick Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Lindsay Posted November 8, 2021 Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 On 06/11/2021 at 21:04, DanMi said: the number really doesn't mean that much anymore, the case could have any gearset in after 50 years plus of recons and they may well have been re-stamped. Restamping or overstamping is very noticeable. This one started off as FK and ended up as GH. People always talk of matching number cars where all components are the originals, so where a Triumph with its' original rebuilt engine is always going to be considered worth more than a replacement unit, I suppose the same is true of gearboxes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pete Lewis Posted November 8, 2021 Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 just not so easy to read saw an advert for a 57 moggie minor on original tyres ...thats a real must have for originality Nah the originality thing is a bit nuts .............triggers broom comes to mind or Henry's head chopping axe same old ??? Pete Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Lindsay Posted November 8, 2021 Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 1 minute ago, Pete Lewis said: the originality thing is a bit nuts .............triggers broom comes to mind or Henry's head chopping axe same old ??? Pete Possibly, but imagine you're buying yet another Triumph ( ) and the owner tells you he's had the original engine rebuilt. Sounds good. You go to look at another one and that seller tells you he's thrown away the original engine and stuck another one in from an identical car. To many, that means the first owner was caring enough to look after his car and repair any wear; the second was possibly more practical or maybe a cost-cutter. It all depends on what you want but the guys who spend big money on classics seem to put store by it. It doesn't really matter as much in a £50 Herald... but it's a bonus. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanMi Posted November 8, 2021 Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 Some of those numbers do look odd as the stamps are clearly different sizes (particularly CB 253192 so not from the same set. Could it be that a reconditioner bought a lot of cases and stamped them, with their own codes. Not sure that anyone would care about a matching no gearbox as they were never recorded outside of the production line and the numbers didn't match like on some manufacturers. also, Did the New Zealand assembly plant use different codes? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Peter Truman Posted November 8, 2021 Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 My understanding of AMI Aussie CKD assembled cars was that engines, gearbox's and diff's came out from England fully assembled so would have UK numbers stamped on them. For confusion the Spitfire G/B I recently rebuilt uses the MG 1500 Single Rail internals that I put into a 3 Rail Box that actually has a GT6 case & number! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
daverclasper Posted November 8, 2021 Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 3 hours ago, Colin Lindsay said: People always talk of matching number cars where all components are the originals, so where a Triumph with its' original rebuilt engine is always going to be considered worth more than a replacement unit It is completely irrational, though I do like that my Vit has org engine (maybe due the engine, considered the heart of the car?), (and to a much lesser extent, things like wiper motor, dynamo, dizzy, as well, A good chance org, as same date stamp on them as car year?). Though as GB is a J Type O.D bitza, I'm just glad it has an O.D. It's definitely, not a value issue, more, I'm just probably a bit higher on the Spectrum, than average, which is ok. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sidd Posted November 8, 2021 Author Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 Thank you for all the responses. Was hoping for an easy way to identify expected contents of the boxes but will need to do some counting and measuring. All the markings look original so a collection of production line 'freedom of choice' stamps. Thanks again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colin Lindsay Posted November 8, 2021 Report Share Posted November 8, 2021 Can you post photos of the complete boxes that are stamped DC and LG? It may be possible to spot something from the box itself rather than the stamped number. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ahebron Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 Like Peter said as in Aus NZ Triumph bought in from the UK assembled drive train components. NZ assembled Triumphs have the prefix 3 on chassis numbers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johny Posted December 10, 2021 Report Share Posted December 10, 2021 Pretty sure the LG is really DG as Ive seen a few examples where they didnt get the angle of the stamp right. So that would be from a Dolomite/Toledo 1300/1500... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Josef Posted December 12, 2021 Report Share Posted December 12, 2021 There's a listing of which gearbox / engine / diff codes were originally supplied with which Triumphs here. I'd assume it's fairly accurate as most of the info is a copy of an e-mail from John Kipping https://www.teglerizer.com/triumphstuff/spit_and_gt6_specs.htm Doesn't cover some of the prefixes discussed though! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
johny Posted December 13, 2021 Report Share Posted December 13, 2021 yes one missing is the infamous WE which although quite common doesnt seem to be listed anywhere... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now